Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 22 December 2014 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5524A1A6F10 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:31:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6JHQP-3nzIcz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com (mail-qa0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA0F1A6FFB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id i13so1655124qae.27 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:31:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PzDtJdFTp5HLhtkm0NIwFzgK1eCiSmADP0xWhxXQFQo=; b=aGiDv6tgCJCCRyXQnqIlnWYlNhDZOKpzMl1zV/kg2WLwX8OrQ9/dy8RJpa6Kn1WwvO wbx3EAadksJn8s7CJSmziPt4K623ucA+pDtV0HCh4PW+bGkwPqx1IevsOFo0eeipPPD5 pDxeRbXIA6S7jeotrNtuy3NyE35WHURRqtBTBu8qRBSqGYDLk45anGceXrOcJuP8/RNm ShqqfjBRDz2HWSGc0sCMYd9aLn9n5qC8OvFHe5UP6ievgWmmjPamKCP4pHC7rSQonZbj /wkIHax7jULGx9g1NZs+HHM8AzsRvkONIKz26OnJ539lKuyt6a2cVwasCbiCpziDBu8m aghQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkleywjtYOi79QA9Z0b+Wjb8VlWySep1vq1Ck+tClIo1r4qZ3PVn49U/HUsjmLNqoTfLTxm
X-Received: by 10.140.98.33 with SMTP id n30mr37792330qge.62.1419280297095; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:31:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.26.135 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:31:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5493696F.3090701@gmail.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <CAPF_GTaJwaS9+9uSSGTC1+RqKb=uF8UQxsP4u5jPJiRi=88-Nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2dvGH6jEp072GxfQwZ=O_QaxZpTrq3bgd2A-gOMj2PL9ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <5493696F.3090701@gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:31:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfnL3pJoGtA=HTSWm_HwnUHAKFsgti_qBB0xgvecQ3Qmzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ZMMHD2_Jgp9oQ_EJBGhNULiv3zI
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:31:39 -0000

2014-12-19 0:55 GMT+01:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>om>:
> The licensing around H264 is a mess, blocking safe usage in open source
> software (which had really big impact in the evolution of open web &
> internet) that cannot control its distribution. Moreover, it is imposing
> unnecessary costs, or in other words, even worse, a revenue to a particular
> group of interests, and exposing new players to unknown risks. These are
> serious impediments for innovation and not something I would expect from an
> open specification from IETF.

+1, but WONTFIX. It seems that there is already consensus and "there
are not open issues to address", which makes sense given than the open
source related issue that you mention hasn't been ever discussed here
so it cannot be an open issue.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>