Re: [rtcweb] AD Review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Sun, 04 November 2018 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46E6130E10 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 01:04:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9hOphsKRJ67 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 01:04:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp121.iad3b.emailsrvr.com (smtp121.iad3b.emailsrvr.com [146.20.161.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00C0E130E11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 01:04:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp16.relay.iad3b.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp16.relay.iad3b.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ED02FC011E; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 04:04:26 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp16.relay.iad3b.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id 5F255C010B; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 04:04:25 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [10.68.211.195] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [173.39.121.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.7.12); Sun, 04 Nov 2018 04:04:26 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3847EC66-5492-4C74-A965-F798C6CB0E66"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3283c7fe-6cc6-71b8-1208-d65e00c2df8e@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 16:04:30 +0700
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch.all@ietf.org, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <73D9B935-234F-4DCF-AA1B-B8E958DF66B7@iii.ca>
References: <3283c7fe-6cc6-71b8-1208-d65e00c2df8e@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ZVdI3cDOw8DMN1eOcSVev39BamQ>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] AD Review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 09:04:31 -0000

> On Oct 31, 2018, at 9:48 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> 
>   == The document seems to contain a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was
>      first submitted on or after 10 November 2008.  The disclaimer is usually
>      necessary only for documents that revise or obsolete older RFCs, and that
>      take significant amounts of text from those RFCs.  If you can contact all
>      authors of the source material and they are willing to grant the BCP78
>      rights to the IETF Trust, you can and should remove the disclaimer.
>      Otherwise, the disclaimer is needed and you can ignore this comment.
>      (See the Legal Provisions document at
>      https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info <https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info> for more information.)

I belive the draft cut and paste in significant text from pre-RFC5378 based drafts thus I don't think we can fix this.