Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment

Victor Pascual <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com> Tue, 09 June 2015 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290DA1A1BDF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZiTk0CY0nqeX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E43941A1BC3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yken206 with SMTP id n206so14177896yke.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=7NirFmp69hUbX2b+YPWhUamiw74Uf0SlTj+BcGbt6gk=; b=mW6J3T3RbyYsaiIeH5DjxsO1sZzsBZtVfKiWVVJ9HmvrmGK7gfDX8Qlr7aEU03pAAG kQ/ODq7zoqKMbPapoJ7mXr8f1RlhHHJ9+FKtA6kGimsVNxtwYdHCQIIbi0Y6wtIz3HJX BLDMoJGEjc4BfsWBnQHEEL7yCQO1oMX1NXLiJn8+WNThmWUaXN1C0Ir3VFhBi4OzwEhx 4GJN/OmCyvT5VVFigaL3+c8m6LqBwTZ02F1LiptmXur77nmNSZu9HCnwetq4dzO0GccJ rYSqav9w4vNvL4OkW8XDxwPGno+LgUyjawcC/4UEObqWAh0XIHwsR7aWUBzYwgv+n9Gp GJXA==
X-Received: by 10.170.45.136 with SMTP id 130mr28022979ykn.105.1433885745309; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.80] ([190.235.61.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c2sm5088115ywa.31.2015.06.09.14.35.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
References: <D8920B96-7C22-4F9F-B323-FC59120C7508@ieca.com> <5531EFD2.5010107@alvestrand.no> <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF81962D96C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AAEC0E1EC8@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <5537CA1F.1060209@alvestrand.no> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E75341E@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <55412808.7040409@alvestrand.no> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E7547BD@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <EDBAF883-E9E6-4810-8168-AFE648161E85@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <EDBAF883-E9E6-4810-8168-AFE648161E85@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <19F65762-3692-4949-82E4-4CBD4B2D3AAC@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D201)
From: Victor Pascual <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:35:38 -0500
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ZVxX-WO8SdtZy0lxXdDSykkGMFc>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:35:47 -0000

Agree

> On May 27, 2015, at 3:00 PM, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@unify.com> wrote:
>> 
>> So I suggest the following text.
>> 
>> "A WebRTC gateway which is deployed where it can be reached with a static IP address (as seen from the client), does not need to support full ICE; it therefore MAY implement ICE-Lite only".
>> 
>> Regards
>> Andy
> 
> +1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb