Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Mon, 08 July 2013 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB65821F9A40 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id coVEXCzPbfBd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA7421F9349 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hz11so4441525pad.16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=TaeoURjcdglh2Zx5VHhBjPEiv8c/aIvAMu1qzY2n8Zs=; b=WdypH5rnQBJID7atbVX++5b0UR/6yys1fNdZ7y8HDRliFcoFN25a3nNrRjhOPRz77k MS35JQEoSCPTSjhOYjbOmY/1ljx08LxjPGK1HOt4m5HhtyJBFHOpjV3uF8iM3EmgpcBV nsyk7QXwGf15TI7oMWWyd2y9nAYeXFSpY2Y3Qe7qgn6ltDTNzQZItfP+tnM77yTMjv+n QcVDKprf2XiNP+8EkZqgG919K6pCp9SiE1WICQhFbYuFR7mQbZcg94+TjhkRbcg8BDaM AWCYR8n9UG9PFob6iXXFQuz6tumkOQMTI7DoufybWsg6ys8+JnzI9mmmWxHb24nSotYU H/+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=TaeoURjcdglh2Zx5VHhBjPEiv8c/aIvAMu1qzY2n8Zs=; b=YakhspBFYH1hXVNrXwrzIkxgaZI26FLLopHXb3Mjm/ippFWqCdOpRoRrBv8PGtJ7PX CC7JJwtbu12ahDXHl8dNZUEh9OAK2n3VUAvhd4Onl0YuJQv10OGT2L/kvir4rJjm2POL CeWRvkhZM298hvIqoYVBZeOLbL+AThHwQWw+bbHfr/1BpTqIfLvTPp/RQAjqJNgSnleq 9B5b7YOU0lkWzOfk4OzL2sft3uhxNvADXc4x1XnmPxxBiyJnr86cZD6EZu61LR40Oncs mgQAZhkD/TURjL60K0MfL6bQQhdrMEXTax/Q3C2wOCacSm2SB/ZNHUNAH+D56MSWduL2 ch2A==
X-Received: by 10.68.28.232 with SMTP id e8mr21892783pbh.94.1373294444983; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 07:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.78.169 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8B58E2AB-09B7-4816-8BC4-B932030E2ED2@iii.ca>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnDD8PAxZMfczV=cZtwx49XDT2+XiRhe5t88cT+xayz5g@mail.gmail.com> <8B58E2AB-09B7-4816-8BC4-B932030E2ED2@iii.ca>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:40:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUEZixeAsDc42WY-kZvrpA-p4s1sjET-qzxZ2VH9x7yc5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520eacd90d6bd04e101070c
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcSjlkOPXt4ZCQ6Xv9Zs+lp3QJ4NyCFoXInOkm5UMdVhfQ4F7DFkDUwaqSdc1pIR6RjqxVVwCwOED/oVIEoJD+qWmWOdiu9F0g1gJF33SDnEAvFhO5+bl3WS9TM38oZk1FyBSHu3c9w1BaoaHRDKbhDbDh1kAIOhK8eAONUDPncM3ezfu4+xCqiTmN4b3s81mu09ZV
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:40:45 -0000

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>; wrote:

>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>; wrote:
>
> > So compatibility with SIP is important but compatibility with Jingle is
> just impossible.
>
> The mapping of SDP to jingle is in the Jingle specs … I'm not express any
> opinion on this one way or another other but the authors of theses specs
> have always claimed Jingle fully mapped to and from SDP.
>

I think he meant "impossible without SDP munging", which I think is
undeniable.



>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>