IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Why are we asking the wrong questions?

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Thu, 20 October 2011 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1438311E8097 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xL9iDYIlIEaa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889F711E8085 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnv1 with SMTP id v1so3833024ggn.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.50.23 with SMTP id x23mr2754656anx.141.1319144822117; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8sm29308655anb.1.2011.10.20.14.07.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnv1 with SMTP id v1so3833003ggn.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.71.234 with SMTP id y10mr22191172pbu.132.1319144820807; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.47.40 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=MGBwHAkqJwt2SaQLtAums=dtCz1RUGjQq__KMcj2BOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD5OKxvBMt_EDzPprGeFGGTPS0z3DXAz9YJPDqCwF6HKuPrpFg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMB_t6g9oh0zxtYDgOkJ3+smjW7GCCS05M9werbGS_kLYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtS8u5H0nq4vq6=OV7J157=SrHRVs6PyJOZyyL_AqeR1g@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=oEm1v3SSDDG=gxX1WSZ0-h_HmQ9BK1Vmyt_xbzjNDkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvk3=sO4Myo6+rPmnshk65hEFCDigRno8=YYEirPU5K6g@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=MGBwHAkqJwt2SaQLtAums=dtCz1RUGjQq__KMcj2BOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:07:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuQQEo41avYjiJxvxsrzjNu0i6sNttPotPZ6mfB6YTFTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec544ebec73961f04afc15654"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Why are we asking the wrong questions?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:07:03 -0000

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> Could you please clarify if you are in favour of mandating the
> in-the-wire signaling protocol or not?
>
> I am saying that it is a convenience feature that provides little useful
functionality apart from a few corner cases and is extremly hard to define.
because of this I am against it.
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email