Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing

Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> Mon, 19 September 2011 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9759D21F8C39 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPmrPKsqtcLq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r2-chicago.webserversystems.com (r2-chicago.webserversystems.com [173.236.101.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F72B21F8BCD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pool-173-49-141-165.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([173.49.141.165] helo=[192.168.1.12]) by r2-chicago.webserversystems.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <randell-ietf@jesup.org>) id 1R5en9-0000Mz-BP for rtcweb@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:25:51 -0500
Message-ID: <4E775026.5000503@jesup.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:22:30 -0400
From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <4E76E8E8.2050102@ericsson.com> <017078EC-3E1A-4CC4-A29F-51B569474416@acmepacket.com> <4E774B34.1090605@jesup.org> <4E774FC3.3000806@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E774FC3.3000806@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - r2-chicago.webserversystems.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jesup.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:23:28 -0000

On 9/19/2011 10:20 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
>>> browser into VNC. Was there discussion on the con call about what IT
>>> department types would think of these two scenarios?
>>
>> To be honest, no, it wasn't discussed, and it very much should be. This
>
> The issue of "what will the enterprise think" has certainly been 
> raised before on this list (albeit in slightly different contexts). 
> See, e.g., 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg00768.html

Yes, though that's a different topic than the security aspect Hadriel 
was asking about (access to screen, mouse, keyboard, etc).  And those 
have not been adequately explored around this use-case that I've proposed.

-- 
Randell Jesup
randell-ietf@jesup.org