Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 18 October 2013 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223B811E82A3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hpIjLKuF-GIN for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4563511E81B8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=339; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382124879; x=1383334479; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=NIY3OD1knbNiQLvWUUbBhwAFt2r6XDrXdWnFIXt7wpU=; b=JKeWqSsIJP2gTJa7R4hHDvNvrzIzmDp6ULRvJmkAKKfW1VGt2IPC0AlD I0Byk83DLTrzJiMexykDg2T4VFR4KkpMsNGvXxgQlxFOTHf0dl4YNk3rz t+EHY8VpdcPEL+LWLmfNjtEPyKYxtkPdrhtIBipxDDCRT4H/OmVfNQNX1 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAHSMYVKtJXG//2dsb2JhbABagweBCr4jgSQWdIImAQEEOj8QAgEIIhQQIRElAgQOBQiHbAMPtxINiWuMZoI9AjEHgx+BCgOWHo47hTeDJIIp
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,524,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="273882928"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2013 19:34:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9IJYcf7009822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:34:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.143]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:34:38 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements
Thread-Index: AQHOzDkV8HvNDfV/akqm1ru7j7zqBw==
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:34:37 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB123CBCA44@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CAMvTgcfvaUMWJaD5zX2rt6DWOWBgHEA-SqNtOqxs_bOqw_Ygbg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXBdQOgs9OKYRrU4wYRghj3WH30=vo-q7iSVjUub1SKow@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOGjsOTXPtAFh+KR9SDQv8tEtUDE3gLvSN+f5dZ2R2R1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVTv4jVZkCDHWKk_X8yb3VEGBLXh+sW00OCG6RXMNkpgA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVTv4jVZkCDHWKk_X8yb3VEGBLXh+sW00OCG6RXMNkpgA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EB9D5F6331BDE145B2B9D10533BA83EF@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:34:45 -0000

On Oct 18, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> 
>>> That should probably be written down, of course.
>> 
>> Agreed.
> 
> The question is: where?
> 
> I have a few hours, maybe I can write down an update to 4572 that fixes this.

that would be excellent if you could do that