IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Martin J. Dürst's preferences

Ron <ron@debian.org> Mon, 13 January 2014 05:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ron@debian.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AA21AD687 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:15:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byaIFUPl1d8V for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:15:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D965A1AD190 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:15:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppp118-210-34-29.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO audi.shelbyville.oz) ([118.210.34.29]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2014 15:45:21 +1030
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FC24F8F3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:45:21 +1030 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at audi.shelbyville.oz
Received: from audi.shelbyville.oz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (audi.shelbyville.oz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id OEHrA-EuwVub for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:45:20 +1030 (CST)
Received: by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90E574F902; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:45:20 +1030 (CST)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:45:20 +1030
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140113051520.GI3245@audi.shelbyville.oz>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <52D280FF.5080503@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <mc85d993kuks88jh3r4ogan262rgq7fvb4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <52D36660.30405@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <52D36660.30405@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Martin J. Dürst's preferences
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:15:34 -0000

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 01:06:56PM +0900, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> 
> In my case, Theora got that low because in my summary judgment, it
> doesn't provide any advantages when compared to VP8 with respect to
> licensing.

It's not quite that simple.  Microsoft ships Theora video from its
Bing service, and Cisco ships VP8 in its hardware products.  And both
of them have very clear licences.

Maybe their lawyers can get together for lunch and reassure each
other of their respective positions.

  Ron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email