Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability

Luca De Cicco <ldecicco@gmail.com> Mon, 06 August 2012 17:16 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <53223349-A31F-4381-899F-82E29B0A0B6C@cisco.com>
References: <53223349-A31F-4381-899F-82E29B0A0B6C@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:16:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CACHLvecT1AgJRo=xM5AH-fGZn+iYrtHqWk7Eym8QJn9U7YGcsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Luca De Cicco <ldecicco@gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b33d6da0d35a604c69c0bda"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability
Precedence: list

I think that the proposed "customizable response to changing network
quality" is a good idea.
Wiring the adaptation logic into webrtc would make it less flexible to
different needs in particular
applications. Of course a default adaptation logic should be implemented in
the browser.

Cheers,
--
Luca De Cicco, PhD
Politecnico di Bari
Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica ed Elettronica
Via Re David, 200 - Bari - ITALY
Office: +39 080 596 3851

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<fluffy@cisco.com>wrote:

>
> I see that Microsoft decided to wait until the W3C and IETF were close to
> done before putting together a proposal that, if accepted, would explode
> most the current works and create maximal delay on this work.
>
> http://blogs.skype.com/en/2012/08/customizable_ubiquitous_real_t.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

[rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Luca De Cicco
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Rohit Puri
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Rohit Puri
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Kevin P. Fleming
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Jim Barnett
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Kevin P. Fleming
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Matthew Kaufman
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Martin J. Dürst
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Alexey Aylarov
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Tim Panton
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Jim Barnett
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Anant Narayanan
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Tim Panton
Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we… Tim Panton