Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability

Luca De Cicco <ldecicco@gmail.com> Mon, 06 August 2012 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ldecicco@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF3F21E8044 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iv6RV0VeP5sD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E731111E8098 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so4117289pbb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9VuwQh7SC6sceckBbGgykfFc9IMruOjtx3ynzZm6NOs=; b=lstfW2iDL+VOz3SBsGpq1gGR/QD/BH+mIM26YqHwPNcnEu9JcTr4DncOjFEIocGEoC vf/54yXhhu3IxPNu5rU1Vcjm+f2UeqGru+Fi8j+kI81RDRuSd2HD4lWYhhwvJhxyuODY RbgkeM3605QgX/7ZhPOi+6UDkSvfHU6EI1tMZK6sSTd8aQrngO+wqCWeOG5vAj9S04/k Y8TXzgfG1oJOUy1qHgrQC1I+Tw+qOOStEJQRnICbC8XBc1KRYrvJZ6ePkK10CG1gnnj9 XWjtf/seKMEWNeHExZlM94BaZRuvUoY67kZMS9/83Kil/Dm9M6bMjZSsefLlU4m0kHcX Q90w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.234.70 with SMTP id uc6mr20440726pbc.44.1344273409455; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.197.193 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53223349-A31F-4381-899F-82E29B0A0B6C@cisco.com>
References: <53223349-A31F-4381-899F-82E29B0A0B6C@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:16:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CACHLvecT1AgJRo=xM5AH-fGZn+iYrtHqWk7Eym8QJn9U7YGcsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Luca De Cicco <ldecicco@gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d6da0d35a604c69c0bda
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:16:51 -0000

I think that the proposed "customizable response to changing network
quality" is a good idea.
Wiring the adaptation logic into webrtc would make it less flexible to
different needs in particular
applications. Of course a default adaptation logic should be implemented in
the browser.

Cheers,
--
Luca De Cicco, PhD
Politecnico di Bari
Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica ed Elettronica
Via Re David, 200 - Bari - ITALY
Office: +39 080 596 3851


On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<fluffy@cisco.com>wrote;wrote:

>
> I see that Microsoft decided to wait until the W3C and IETF were close to
> done before putting together a proposal that, if accepted, would explode
> most the current works and create maximal delay on this work.
>
> http://blogs.skype.com/en/2012/08/customizable_ubiquitous_real_t.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>