Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Fri, 19 July 2013 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBA311E813A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.284
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.284 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JstjGmJmNNz0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3567F11E812C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.171.47.8] (unknown [209.121.225.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A35BF50A73; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:24:25 -0400 (EDT)
References: <CA+9kkMAaaT5RRLUrGvzs0zB0jXRQdHLm5HJH5-VkT5p1ZetVPQ@mail.gmail.com> <51DC3644.4020107@bbs.darktech.org> <CABcZeBPC2FUZ+oCSNVHwAqzrSar=wTqz0AGZ6YqpoOfJjy0qSg@mail.gmail.com> <51DC8445.2030902@bbs.darktech.org>
In-Reply-To: <51DC8445.2030902@bbs.darktech.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <E597FDC9-9E24-4598-B62A-4067847ABF7A@iii.ca>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329)
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:24:26 -0700
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:24:33 -0000

On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:44 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>; wrote:

>    Three weeks ago I posted a summary of discussion points that came up in the WebRTC World conference (most of which had to do with the WebRTC API). To date, I have not received a reply from any of the people you have listed. I am unable to gather the necessary momentum to turn these points into action items without your help. I was/am frustrated that the spec editors and vendors are responsible to engage the community on these matters, but did not. I hope this clarifies what I meant.

Many of us have been very busy updating drafts for ietf deadline so it as been a hard time to respond.