IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Relaxing SDP O/A rules?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 05 October 2012 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF16F21F8605 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.326, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFW-Mt4Ics4z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A6121F85F9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k13so1929788lbo.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HIW8kW62zVDIjQP6FFVBdkBQlGtJluR+9h4ChY2gFXQ=; b=Wo3kDHZMKbLuEE6bjreYBVk+++CSxYoZ747IA8LpmaunPtAYkA7/kt3bpa39cL78qC PTMzOQZIrgsvPqwyQSj4Mk6pr+5mqwndrGzNsuMdUeJilP3ev1om6GSOPzmP6pfpLIW4 u29IPGWV7rNb6lil2jT8Pj1V1nOVh9AIvVwwpF+DJPlEkwab65cQIGtM2bmSKXZIpCRx qMdPFqu/P8P6Z9vhe91V1gvDMdSvkPq5AQBRY9H8v6Kvjv+lAFjyf3dXhShgavd593MQ A6pRqQpmsQNG4lLMHE3P5T7vHzGacWKAb+x0M6bJ1ThCPQORMlhfs4xahoxyZWkH9x28 8bYw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.14.161 with SMTP id q1mr10037lbc.123.1349479197735; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.83.2 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2FE5@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A1E3AB1@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnUFvw_J2+tvVBoHrzR9ZRkPT-6LhXvbaz_U1P7gqtJ4xw@mail.gmail.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A7BC848@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnV6NcTeh=L_fpkpLv5UpkUSuacmQUtYwNKKwAfcb5+JQA@mail.gmail.com> <506D4F7A.5020109@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnUgHRw4dtihk2fZppmzVWuV4hpvWtXt70N1HWQpJ+KsZw@mail.gmail.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2FDF@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnV+jHWF3t8s3t37pbQyXJEP9N_MyHWd3SsfoNrhMU=NXw@mail.gmail.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A7BD0C5@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnVFWDroiTWVOm6F3FRQ6dDkRjKdyV8apRK=0Y_ReYtmPA@mail.gmail.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2FE5@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:19:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUR6XL4QLmZAUVqnB5S+UFh7sfmzkDzfjK52+e9_FFkJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Relaxing SDP O/A rules?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:19:59 -0000

On 5 October 2012 14:26, Christer Holmberg
<christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>> Can I use the same local descriptor for every setLocal() call?
>>
>> My experience suggests that you can.  However, that's not stipulated
>> in the API specification, so it's not an ironclad guarantee.
>
> If it doesn't, and a new local descripor is created, you would need to send that one to the remote endpoint.

You don't create a new description, you just set one.  The only
problem arises when you can't set the local description because
something broke since you last set it.  (Maybe setting the answer
caused the browser to release something that you need to set the
offer.)

If that happens, you are hosed.  You could try to make a new
PeerConnection, but you'll have to resend your INVITE because you will
get a new set of candidates, ufrag, pwd, etc...

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status