Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs
"Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com> Mon, 30 July 2012 18:51 UTC
Return-Path: <kpfleming@digium.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A8711E8151 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ALUH0eYeRE7k for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.digium.com (mail.digium.com [216.207.245.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADF511E813F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.24.55.203] (helo=zimbra.hsv.digium.com) by mail.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kpfleming@digium.com>) id 1Svv3k-0004Xo-Ud for rtcweb@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:51:16 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.hsv.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5363D887D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:51:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from zimbra.hsv.digium.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.hsv.digium.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ocF6Q6VBsM5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:51:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.24.19.142] (sligo.digium.internal [10.24.19.142]) by zimbra.hsv.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71F88D887A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:51:16 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <5016D79A.1050902@digium.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:51:06 -0500
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com>
Organization: Digium, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CAOJ7v-2nghk6HcFv_6xAs+hrK=Uqm+oTsvqLFtxm4oDBY9oDgA@mail.gmail.com> <5015D506.5010201@mozilla.com> <5015E6FF.2000804@reavy.org> <5015FBE7.9060809@thaumas.net> <501640E3.1000009@jesup.org> <CAMKM2Lz=4gaSA8fj8B304UfaCKp=_DWW3WDhdKTdtULwaMbiJg@mail.gmail.com> <501650B0.6060308@infosecurity.ch>
In-Reply-To: <501650B0.6060308@infosecurity.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:51:18 -0000
On 07/30/2012 04:15 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > What's the Microsoft position on WebRTC in general? > > Are they going to dump/skip/sabotage-it or are they going to participate? > > If they will participate, will they try to leverage skype/msn codecs > compatibility? At least one of the Skype codecs (SILK) has already been integrated into Opus and we're hoping it will be part of the WebRTC codecs list. If I remember the discussions from the CODEC working group properly, the version of it in Opus is even better than SILK itself was, so there's really no reason for SILK to be used in new applications. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: kfleming@digium.com | SIP: kpfleming@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
- [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Maire Reavy
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Serge Lachapelle
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs David Benham (dbenham)
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Google statement on codecs Miguel Casas-Sanchez