[rtcweb] Comparision between H.264 Baseline and VP8
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 06 August 2012 13:58 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D549B21F8617 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r4itb81CkVXi for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD9321F8623 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 06:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2935339E0FA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:58:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ERK1fMp2Yeld for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:58:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (unknown [188.113.88.47]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27F4139E062 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:58:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <501FCDA3.7050900@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:58:59 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080305030808040409060505"
Subject: [rtcweb] Comparision between H.264 Baseline and VP8
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:58:59 -0000
Executing on an action item:
I enclose a presentation that was shown by Mohamad Raad at the recent
ISO MPEG meeting in Stockholm, comparing VP8 with the "anchors" for the
IVC project (H.264 Baseline, approximately).
The comparisions to "RFM 1.1" refer to the so-called "Chinese proposal"
for a royalty-free codec.
Stefan Wenger was there; I'm sure he can give more details on the
comments that were made, in particular why the "Class D" results were
seen as suspicious.
Harald
- [rtcweb] Comparision between H.264 Baseline and V… Harald Alvestrand