IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] [BEHAVE] URI schemes for TURN and STUN

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Sat, 05 November 2011 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDDB21F8A69; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 08:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.685
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.685 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w3aV8Aj8kPFw; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 08:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C091021F8A71; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 08:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:616:213:d4ff:fe04:3e08] (shalmaneser.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:616:213:d4ff:fe04:3e08]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "petithug", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E02E200D1; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:05:56 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4EB552F0.6050800@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:14:56 -0700
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111010 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com>
References: <4EAC6BF4.2000604@alvestrand.no> <CALiegf=f4kFzyDLWK+Y5vbuCEJFXX590+VuZ4bbnHZnvX0CoBA@mail.gmail.com> <4EAC8AE0.3020307@acm.org> <4EACD558.1050003@alvestrand.no> <4EAE157F.5020901@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EAEB76B.9090304@acm.org> <8B0C4061-D362-4DFE-9677-7E64515A6E1C@network-heretics.com> <4EAF9391.5040209@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EB05A23.3060101@alvestrand.no> <01O80L7NM7N000RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com> <CABcZeBPCGcUcEDNJ5T3+LowrdTz-NAka3Q33CA8mvdwb0=+aZg@mail.gmail.com> <4EB480E7.1010200@alvestrand.no> <CABcZeBPba+PU5234jpHRYa0sfiwKVVFg6C-oGXBUEehvjrmpmw@mail.gmail.com> <48690B43-422C-4B65-8A70-B01F01F8FD97@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <48690B43-422C-4B65-8A70-B01F01F8FD97@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [BEHAVE] URI schemes for TURN and STUN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:15:02 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/05/2011 08:04 AM, Gonzalo Salgueiro wrote:
> 
> On Nov 5, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no
>> <mailto:harald@alvestrand.no>> wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2011 04:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>
>>>> I don't have any commitment to the scheme. What's the best place?
>>>
>>> I like parameters, like this:
>>>
>>> turn://user@host?proto=tcp
>>>
>>> Quite hard to misunderstand, and quite easy to extend.
>>>
>>> (Note: // is only allowed if what follows is [user[:pass]@]host - I don't
>>> recommend using the password, for the obvious reasons, but the syntax will
>>> allow it.)
>>
>> I don't see any security problem with that. The "break old
>> implementations" rationale
>> doesn't apply when we are defining a new URI scheme.
> 
> I agree with this as well.  If we can get some consensus with this, I will
> update the next version of both the STUN and TURN URI Scheme drafts to include
> this format.

Or you can look at draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uri-bis, which is already
doing it right (and had a lot of reviews back in 2008, before I split the
resolution mechanism and the syntax in two separate documents).

I know my email address does not contain the magical "cisco.com", but this is
getting ridiculous.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Personal email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Professional email: petithug@acm.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk61Uu4ACgkQ9RoMZyVa61eFrQCgiw1H8kTxgpd90sV1OYuSg3tN
B+cAnA9V/XhzV3MAg93WOxpKIAvwk/Nu
=jYZJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email