Re: [rtcweb] Why http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-miniero-rtcweb-http-fallback-00.txt ?

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 07 August 2012 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1C221F8717 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u12UxgoVs7SJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DD321F8715 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbgg6 with SMTP id gg6so18701lbb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=VRmg1t9jgIq+b3rzyegJBhWQsRMLdhoyoK7sc0MbNVA=; b=nej4Tv0TLPwYplATfNpYNZ2GgvBkrMCTBFDSWKDKY3seP4NeNgnZBvFPfBr4JuLA0O /qEmyHOyIOQSiN6qXPA8tUR7gTC0aAqmcZyUeegjVFwYvhoqXpVrq5oEXi/tr3mXW2Hy qjIWHBgbNh+gwgWEkus6BMW21fNeqTdzNeb6je4kHz8/xHWUoP5jBUIPmJo1v2+ZbM/6 Bschm86+68PvvWAJHHsDIyt4djqbAzhvMF3B0jgbh1bInR5X9BJKMzKdRtiWyzXqIoLs ZJxhodVOD58/smR41bxdg59EkQ89JYZZRwOTnFwpA48oFCD/U+0nYS01LPhxLJPZU68h osrA==
Received: by 10.112.27.226 with SMTP id w2mr6737941lbg.57.1344363558507; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.23.2 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <50215A96.20604@acm.org>
References: <CALiegf=GqR+J3YcAgpRtxid+aDsKeiQttRm8JbjT6RrQWaMG=w@mail.gmail.com> <50215A96.20604@acm.org>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:18:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=9BaAnh+RLzihCKmVUTAbEZQ3py8xt53313nvU8a1bkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhud5925qrB3iqOHP4ixBkbpIVDTCc9QZ+rF+BVAYEZIUu4i4ZorUItbgskZdA1N00+hG1
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Why http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-miniero-rtcweb-http-fallback-00.txt ?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:19:20 -0000

2012/8/7 Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>:
> Or TURN over Websocket.

Why do we need that? By using TURN over TLS we have all we need to
avoid stupid hotel's firewalls (that provide "Internet free access"
but just for HTTP port 80 and HTTPS port 443). It just about setting a
TURN server listening TLS on port 443, am I right?

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>