Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?

[Derek Pang <[e-mail]>]

Also, is there information on the voting process and instruction ?


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Mishra, Sanjay
<[e-mail]>wrote:

> Magnus -- To confirm, the voting period is be two weeks, so I am assuming
> starting tomorrow (Nov 28) and lasting for two weeks (Dec 12?).
>
> Thanks
> Sanjay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Magnus
> Westerlund
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:44 AM
> To: Thomas Reisinger
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?
>
> On 2013-11-27 14:16, Thomas Reisinger wrote:
> > Magnus,
> >
> > Could you please share the latest list and how the voting will be
> conducted/what's required to vote.
>
> For the proposed voting process see our previous message
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html
>
> As I stated, we chairs will need to update this based on the discussion.
>
> For the current list of alternatives is on the WG's wiki:
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/wiki/WikiStart
>
>
> Reproduced here:
>  The following alternatives has been proposed:
>
>  1. All entities MUST support H.264
>  2. All entities MUST support VP8
>  3. All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8  4. Browsers MUST support
> both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST
>     support at least one of H.264 and VP8  5. All entities MUST support at
> least one of H.264 and VP8  6. All entities MUST support H.261  7. There is
> no MTI video codec  8. 5+6, i.e. All entities MUST support H.261 and all
> entities MUST
>     support at least one of H.264 and VP8  9. All entities MUST support
> Theora 10. All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261}
> 11. All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.263} 12. All
> entities MUST support decoding using both H.264 and VP8, and
>     MUST support encoding using at least one of H.264 or VP8
>
> H.264 is a reference to the proposal in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal/
>
> VP8 is a reference to the proposal in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8/
>
>
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Thomas Reisinger
> >
> >> On 27.11.2013, at 09:50, Magnus Westerlund <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2013-11-25 20:51, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>> MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, H.261}
> >>
> >> I have now updated the list to read:
> >>
> >> 10. All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP,
> >> H.261} 11. All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264
> >> CBP, H.263}
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Magnus Westerlund
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> - Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Ericsson AB                | Phone  [phone]
> >> Färögatan 6                | Mobile [phone]
> >> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [e-mail]
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  [phone]
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile [phone]
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>