IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 08 December 2014 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BBB1ACDAA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:06:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1pCDImauDSb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1457B1ACDAF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so6969318wgg.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=hOpdbjQ2sSRuBB026jcXwLtB1FtCvTRD8z09jzI8WEQ=; b=GB/UiYxj5IEKtZ15IhRaXBF1Ww3pFiA4IFTRaltpFkT5bqEBG7b2AKKNhHEmB6C9IC hzsFSebjYqRE7EqSTW10pfK/yBcCndMdkaCL9iBBGdwstyjAAhrahFhPnjrSJsK5IW4N F7hxdNba2wdyDB+Z0BW8N+qnQh3GWMixbc4Kd/csCO8/wLM3jOnbP0R3iBKafLnQ6Lqt uk6e4alBpWyr4NjSgxwdu2PCYOr4rp7kPg6zVeNntAN7awPL3uwhq9AjaOnPMg5DzShx bmfXg9ZuEC0GRjqaY3zkpGugiTekB2g+oTYO+JNOP2oJpAFu6AaLa6ztP8How+3ZJBBP uQjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcAneLrLuM8cu4dfIa4NDb0CE7/o9vj9t5QMp70A+XWw/ZRrRf6hWNAAErFPpows1Shx1N
X-Received: by 10.180.107.136 with SMTP id hc8mr26552784wib.32.1418065572812; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:06:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.130.34 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:05:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-3NbwmnU0eaZNzEQB4N8HxQjF61HgvOeMqVmA=uoLQ_TA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <5485CC5B.2030104@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnV4vhxBAQzr3BcL78uk+fSGi9DNvG=9XfdUsQekpWp5FA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3NbwmnU0eaZNzEQB4N8HxQjF61HgvOeMqVmA=uoLQ_TA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:05:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CABcZeBN5C0jT1SmDOzTZO71WMNfrWv0ZNTyH2sR4eeu+HjJOjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f3bad45bc6cf50509b91e7f"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/a8reTLQTa9yjvo2DYOU0i8-tbOU
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:06:16 -0000

Just to reiterate what I said in the room, I agree with this.

-Ekr


On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>
> As stated before - I think this plan represents a legitimate compromise
> in what had previously seemed like a stalemate. While not my ideal outcome,
> I think this is good for the WebRTC ecosystem - it ensures
> interoperability, and provides a reasonably clear path for reaching a
> completely RF solution.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 8 December 2014 at 08:05, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
>> wrote:
>> > Since others who were present in the room are repeating their position
>> > on the list, I'll do so too.
>>
>> That's probably a good thing to do.  An almost anonymous humming sound
>> isn't a good basis for establishing a record.
>>
>> > I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email