Re: [rtcweb] RFC 8855 registries

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 04 February 2021 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAE83A1705 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:40:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VAbgyfatCLWx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 432F23A1703 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:40:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id d7so2141595otq.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:40:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ci2Ht9X7RU/90in+CAMB+4qsI4rBmjg9e2x+HTrsej8=; b=UxlppefsXpv+1YOeWrL0/MEulZcYlpsPBXffh+8W8+WNb8mykhNZYyZgwF9Tr6rB/w vkDxmheFtXRD6zWVa5u945KFSJouCxyxOZmsOdSswUZLqL6F0mO3/hv4gKb8xax89UBR wW8XBH2DHyb9g7RUxTbVVeMsRUEfzgl8QZTyM6Gy/fhLEEP1edxuPlezUp2hYbIehc+N zMhdNpTfNtG2Hb9+bSq/xf/GWgrpu+7q0woGem1qD7HYGKMxyjXxox58asndzvglfaav 62Dvy762kF1MvHmK1d3g8touB8t6fgWvof/S5DuQykd+OnftsUPRnJbHGejEJgy+u0lo zFDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ci2Ht9X7RU/90in+CAMB+4qsI4rBmjg9e2x+HTrsej8=; b=FizJjWHirq++d2D47Qfyw1/x5gF4LQozBpRkJS+jRHTVZx682IgdsvUsd00lsYu3Re Z77YEaQqD9PHaqOhM7xBX7IwNahU3t+aqCcgnF0LYBiLSAzozekUFQnGxkougPYBW6EE 88fV45sXlbCgBLl0VE+l5Xp6cYWkrrzM4gR2QdRdaKlMkpvmYeHmZq/uPVuFDsXIx7TM m9Rq9HZHAOEeyb1ipGkf5CEENX6D3Sj1hWiuI9DqUtHxjtga2e0P4L4gXpr1aELPZwE4 1M5oew3cwHXe2baurDlMQ5iMQ21MyKxfbi0WBnrDGo3JMaCt7x36hmGbZzwTYb3l9EJS qRzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Tgze6yogE8aik9S4gkzicKKXWoCVIIPIg2JA7HvJAbl0GE1xv CYYpjEuv4CCYgyTwy35ipGeCeY638GIa7doHf3ZuRw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0GfjSTgsH0GgxnEQ4kKtZP9zGC5MgMxxyP7NWtnYiGpRoPe1FUu0AGQcYK/Z1oJB1m/H58twhnV1rjoo4bUA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:150a:: with SMTP id k10mr585302otp.144.1612464036083; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:40:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZ0hA4a-r_kNHPQUnSt-RhZx2SE=-YkFWBVaCQT4EJCgQ@mail.gmail.com> <AM0PR07MB386001A775A044C8867E5D2693B39@AM0PR07MB3860.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAL0qLwZ0KRQ12ak=X00WOJiuRCYJzOczjnDbx5GJs=X8c==kWA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfna7Kyc24pvze+VPD5qPc60o+xzJ5iNPiOV9nsxeALpAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYxvpswVZ1eWk6x-hw+VSP-kBiswQgKeqQxXKYaeeCCcw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=E-UtJ0aL5fYES8v54-D5CDXo2C415XtvDd35T92CZOg@mail.gmail.com> <AM0PR07MB38600886C5FF7C73BF85785B93B39@AM0PR07MB3860.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB38600886C5FF7C73BF85785B93B39@AM0PR07MB3860.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:40:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegf=3aHjdGgWWcHN28rkasPDmaS=Dom5L7qLWZrXDNYbQgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001588e305ba870af7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/aIoPu8FtDvcPq7EkFFbxZD6MUpA>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RFC 8855 registries
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 18:40:40 -0000

Obviously ;)

El El jue, 4 feb 2021 a las 19:39, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> escribió:

>
> >> The chairs of that working group, when closing it, made that proposal.
> I didn't think it sounded like a crazy idea given both contributed to C238,
> but if that was wrong, I'm happy to look for volunteers elsewhere.
> >
> > I fail to see why WebRTC (or browsers or devices capable of running a
> WebRTC stack) need a "unified" messaging protocol.
>
> There was actually a draft defining a WebRTC data channel usage for BFCP,
> but it never progressed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> --
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>