[rtcweb] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11: (with COMMENT)

Datatracker on behalf of Benjamin Kaduk <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 07 March 2019 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E9D13136E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 01:48:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1551952130; bh=cQWKj8ovnifFBic3PpRI8xHxiTu0EPH6RGsrz2eCeMM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=CWA4ZZ51azSsQNZyOgCeAxer+Ae/WvhLI+0YMTTtfelLSBA4jA7debvHpGuXGipO3 RhP+vgZpMkIgL1Ie3BpT/7TYuKiX4UVMiXuD9l7sDJT8MwVpH4YiT09nDWmaXSmQXB eNtrkqNOXLmzcqq5LgUB5SsV8STYYgj2l9BQt76E=
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Datatracker on behalf of Benjamin Kaduk <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, sean@sn3rd.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.93.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155192710483.13718.15164609638438627437.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:51:44 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/aPneAVD1br8NPrNySf179zc7atk>
Subject: [rtcweb] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:48:55 -0000

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Ben about the STUN/TURN normativity.

Section 5.1

   2.  By default, WebRTC should be able to negotiate direct peer-to-
       peer connections between endpoints (i.e., without traversing a
       NAT or relay server).  [...]

I'm not sure how to interpret "be able to", here, with respect to
"without traversing a NAT", since if one endpoint is behind a NAT w.r.t.
the public Internet, that's not possible.

Section 5.2

   Mode 1 MUST only be used when user consent has been provided.  The
   details of this consent are left to the implementation; one potential
   mechanism is to tie this consent to getUserMedia consent.

nit: we may not have left a big enough breadcrumb trail for the reader
to find "getUserMedia consent".