Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id E460921F8865 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:20:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MkySVA7yWLxo for
 <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:20:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by
 ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5087621F884B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>;
 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with
 cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
 smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE41322E200 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>;
 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:20:00 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <510632D1.4020704@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:19:58 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D9C969AF-2B75-4F3D-B725-8F64E362BC1D@iii.ca>
References: <50FD4C4B.9020700@ericsson.com>
 <CA+9kkMD7hYacr-P+iBdPiPYu4PWbMmu7tXYnYsNHRA18jogb=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11338EB86@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
 <50FEB1EC.9060803@ericsson.com>
 <CA+9kkMDCn1M084-qcMWh38oao+A64ToQBZTo1wauyBbhD4mhjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113397466@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
 <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA076D1E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
 <510632D1.4020704@ericsson.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs call
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list
 <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>,
 <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>,
 <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:20:11 -0000

I've received a bunch of emails on this. So just to try and be clear, =
what the chairs sent out was there was "no consensus" on the questions =
we asked. The question of what, if any additional MTI audio codecs might =
get added is not resolved in any way.=20


On Jan 28, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Magnus Westerlund =
<magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> We chairs was considering inclusion in draft-ietf-webrtc-audio, but we
> didn't have any strong opinions on this. Based on that several WG
> participants thinks this should be an independent document, I thus
> decided that we will start out with an independent document. If the WG
> feels differently later we can always fold the text into the audio =
codec
> and processing requirements document.
>=20
> I would recommend that the individuals interested in contributing a
> codec writes an independent submission with focus on the codec
> considerations around the codec(s) they are interested in. Then we can
> merge this into a common WG document.
>=20
> Cheers
>=20
> Magnus
>=20
>=20
> On 2013-01-27 10:14, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>> Hi WG chairs,
>>=20
>> Clarification question:=20
>>=20
>>> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
>>> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant =
Codecs".
>>=20
>> Inclusion where?=20
>>=20
>> Thanks and Regards,
>>=20
>> Dan
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On =
Behalf
>>> Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:47 PM
>>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio =
Codecs
>>> call
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> We have been running a call for consensus regarding Selecting
>>> Recommended Audio Codecs.
>>>=20
>>> At this point the chairs are calling this as "no WG consensus".
>>>=20
>>> We can however note a strong interest in a non-normative listing of
>>> potentially important codecs including a description why they should =
be
>>> considered to be supported in WebRTC implementations.
>>>=20
>>> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
>>> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant =
Codecs".
>>> That can contain a list of codecs which are relevant in specific
>>> contexts, along with a short description of the context for each.
>>> Specifically there seems to be interest in understanding the =
advantages
>>> and costs of G.722, AMR, and AMR-WB. We hope that text would broaden
>>> understanding of the WebRTC use case contexts.
>>>=20
>>> The WG chairs
>>> Magnus, Ted and Cullen
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
>=20
> Magnus Westerlund
>=20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> F=E4r=F6gatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

