IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] FW: I-D Action: draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-00.txt

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Mon, 11 March 2013 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C3A21F8CBE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBTMhoVMQpN7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1EE21F8C35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=842; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363032106; x=1364241706; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=vk9q+l+0MrEiEwK1/3TJirXPGw2jspCxE62K5zYYq6k=; b=mN1sfNEc5UhFVZ79WIR6z93zwxqtmBXNg+7cbsqLo3dgOjhE9MwwWo5r XAVpydN5encSA+wqKFcOKlob/JG1+7J+difmCtRbbSBgCDgrsAiGeIF7N S+vrlB1k8tj+PucCklHZiiUzT0Tq3uuLn+jZe6D1S8QhThppBpve/0x5c U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgFACY3PlGtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABDh2S9AoFfFnSCKQEBAQQBAQEkRx0BCCJLCxwJAgQBEgiICwy/TY5dOIJfYQOIPI83j1eBVIE2gig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,825,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="186219628"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2013 20:01:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2BK1jIC031650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:01:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.112]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:01:45 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] FW: I-D Action: draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOHpNBxccKfXwcAkGpPlGeyd8T3Q==
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:01:44 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040901B8B9@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <513E372C.6060405@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [10.21.116.59]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <2E20F5A3E8BFF1469479C6842F5DACA4@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] FW: I-D Action: draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:01:47 -0000

I meant an ISP provided service, not a "hoping over the ISP" scenario.

On 3/11/13 12:57 PM, "Simon Perreault" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:

>Le 2013-03-11 15:52, Reinaldo Penno (repenno) a écrit :
>>> STUN and TURN don't require any support from ISPs.
>>
>> If ISPs want to provide RTCweb like services don't they need STUN and
>>TURN
>> Servers so that ICE can gather candidates?
>
>An example of freely-accessible non-ISP STUN/TURN service:
>http://numb.viagenie.ca
>
>Simon
>-- 
>DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
>NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
>STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email