Re: [rtcweb] Dependencies on drafts in our documents

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 15 August 2013 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C14421E80E9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.857
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.742, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wjarfnDClHiB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298A321E809C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,881,1367996400"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="81132246"
Received: from vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.104]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2013 19:16:26 -0700
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.240]) by vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.104]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:16:26 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Dependencies on drafts in our documents
Thread-Index: AQHOmOG4tfePcj9YY0aSDhLFMSB7IpmV/neA
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:16:25 +0000
Message-ID: <76DB10A9-51B3-4F26-AA77-A12A953BB2B8@netapp.com>
References: <520B6A59.1050104@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <520B6A59.1050104@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8B7E9114-CBBF-4397-B0B4-2832CBFFE059"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Dependencies on drafts in our documents
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:16:34 -0000

On Aug 14, 2013, at 19:30, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> Now - apart from those drafts - do the chairs or the participants know of OTHER drafts that should be referenced, directly or indirectly, from the -overview draft?

I'd have expected draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers to be discussed somewhere (appendix A?); similarly draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements as a heads-up for an eventual future mandatory mechanism out of RMCAT.

Lars