IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Sun, 29 December 2013 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD121AE32A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:39:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fc1xYiWDclJs for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075A41AE325 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.200] (p548198F1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.152.241]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02191C0C069E; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 23:39:47 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <52C08E4B.7060903@omnitor.se>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 23:39:44 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EBC65D67-06DD-4AB5-813B-B40214659246@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <5280E181.20104@ericsson.com> <52AE2C51.5000600@omnitor.se> <52AEC405.6070107@alvestrand.no> <52AF672B.2090100@omnitor.se> <E6CB9269-46BA-44E7-AA23-FF778AA9EBF1@lurchi.franken.de> <52BEF74A.2070601@omnitor.se> <7E087676-1C91-47D3-82E8-08C034780AAF@lurchi.franken.de> <52BF364D.5030801@omnitor.se> <968915A0-18BD-477B-BA70-7B891819BFFC@lurchi.franken.de> <52C08E4B.7060903@omnitor.se>
To: Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:39:57 -0000

On Dec 29, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> wrote:

> On 2013-12-29 19:50, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>> >
>>> >I think rtcweb-data-channel usage of SCTP need to require to get the report about the failure.
>> I think there are onerror callbacks...
> Right. There are both onerror and onclose.  So, it is just missing information on when and why these are called.
Correct. And what the arguments of the callbacks are...

Best regards
Michael
> 
> /Gunnar
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email