Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

Max Jonas Werner <mail@makk.es> Tue, 03 December 2013 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@makk.es>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066181AE13B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 05:36:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQcmeBEbN9Ge for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 05:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lupus.uberspace.de (lupus.uberspace.de [95.143.172.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E42551AE114 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 05:35:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4956 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2013 13:35:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?141.22.28.156?) (141.22.28.156) by lupus.uberspace.de with SMTP; 3 Dec 2013 13:35:53 -0000
Message-ID: <529DDE37.6020202@makk.es>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:35:51 +0100
From: Max Jonas Werner <mail@makk.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl> <52974AA8.6080702@cisco.com> <1F79045E-8CD0-4C5D-9090-3E82853E62E9@nominum.com> <52976F56.4020706@dcrocker.net> <3CD78695-47AD-4CDF-B486-3949FFDC107B@nominum.com> <5006.1385666853@sandelman.ca> <D4D5920A-E041-42E8-BB1C-1CB24FBEE3F4@nominum.com> <BLU169-W1176AB7AECF0757C380A70E93EE0@phx.gbl> <20131129060936.GV3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <6mkp9912042i9gkg87fc3ji8g9tkv6uqrh@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <529CEAA6.9000501@librevideo.org> <e5bq99dg3h6e82mnsn6k21aunc9eqlvc7q@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <529D4617.6060909@bbs.darktech.org>
In-Reply-To: <529D4617.6060909@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XdpLDbf8N8GCFq72msetti7nobWPxNRHh"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:36:00 -0000

On 03.12.2013 03:46, cowwoc wrote:
[...]
> Bjoern,
> 
> I'd like to point you to http://www.netindex.com/upload/allcountries/ 
> for two reasons:
> 
>  1. It states that Germany has an average upload rate of 3.13Mbps.

This statement does not say anything about the upload rate of the
majority of users.

>  2. It shows that upload speeds are increasing over time.

Probably, but they are still extremely low in comparison to the
downstream rate.

/max