IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when"

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 14 November 2013 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4835821F9CC5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:39:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.69
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bm2CX6Tp9qKL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D07811E8121 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id rAE1d3X8014862; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:39:03 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 1aaa_45c5_8b20ea9c_4ccd_11e3_a724_001e6722eec2; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:39:03 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [133.2.210.1]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B927BFF5D; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:39:03 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <528429A8.1050407@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:38:48 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ron <ron@debian.org>
References: <5282A340.7010405@gondwanaland.com> <20131113165526.GA13468@verdi> <5283E700.5090300@bbs.darktech.org> <CACKRbQf=x-wKUFemNhf4ZDwgZzqBFq=okUMw=BLCwaMmE7OJPw@mail.gmail.com> <5283FDF1.8030708@bbs.darktech.org> <20131114003608.GQ3245@audi.shelbyville.oz>
In-Reply-To: <20131114003608.GQ3245@audi.shelbyville.oz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:39:29 -0000

On 2013/11/14 9:36, Ron wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 05:32:17PM -0500, cowwoc wrote:
>> Start with H.261 and replace it the moment you find something better.
>
> Except this would essentially be an RFC 6919 MUST (BUT WE KNOW YOU WON"T)
> recommendation, since nobody is going to spend development effort on a
> thing that gives thumbnail video that wasn't even acceptable for users
> in the 80's.

Is there some place (ideally a Web site) that shows (potentially 
simulated) H.261 side-by-side with H.264 baseline or V8 or both with the 
same bandwidth, so that it's easy to compare?

Regards,   Martin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email