Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Tue, 09 December 2014 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E8E1A8A1E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:37:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mOLL77_jnx9A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93761A8A0B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y20so970970ier.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:37:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnjBVhk9bTYUJcMErasyA+KZlKxGVyTDUzi6kiBZwQo=; b=XnOongNjX4SUPwTejnUatXUqzdAfHeHTMGdZlIyeRnxQW28mAFvw8XJsbxEKygQi+B nJuGZq8AdLt8xPc79IIDJcVG4WFxLENPaKUvURremA075K19rzLRTn6CD4PbzPXZi3nO Egwbe3pnOHmIs9AIHRdaZnin+zQCLZzFRx2ln4eCfzaGEz9PcTds4BfsKN/uoRrXEjcg 5x3EHTfJ9GU9f1rgCO/CWlZFTyHOXrUqnY2jR5+QzYbwHN66uooxnl3z6rrCifBUwsqu Yf1CNt0gVNPo4RAnztbFZAS7OkGT+/H93d8+TK/5Bb00pGFf7NKM2264RE50igE6B90k Vq/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkt8i2EgiTB96UoOYUfP7TozqeC3qvoLEs/GNmlkfDR5edj7PfTtmVUQc2vTljtp68dKnLa
X-Received: by 10.107.19.9 with SMTP id b9mr17786303ioj.48.1418146653226; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g139sm841499iog.41.2014.12.09.09.37.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5487331F.8050404@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:36:31 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/bZlYcaBXYki54NCfriRHZ8tbISo
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:37:35 -0000

On 09/12/2014 12:32 PM, David Singer wrote:
>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 1:44 , Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>>
>> I note that the "confirming sense of the room" thread has gotten a lot
>> of messages that are not declaring a position on the question.
>>
>> I also note that from the messages on the thread, I can't figure out if
>> Keith Drage, Gili, Monty Montgomery or Peter Saint-Andre have taken a
>> position (I could guess, but I don't want to - besides, they might not
>> want to take a position, which is perfectly OK).
>>
>> It would be nice for me as a reader if people could:
>>
>> - state their position on the "confirming sense of the room" thread
>> - change the subject line when they want to say anything else
>>
>> That's my preference - of course, people who have "mute thread" in their
>> email readers might want the whole discussion to stay on thread, and
>> will hate me for the last suggestion....
>>
>> Harald
> Thanks, Harald, that would help.
>
> I would also like to know from those confirming the sense of the room, whether THEY THEMSELVES intend to implement both codecs, or whether they conveniently think they don’t need to, and it’s just a problem for other people to handle.
>
> Honestly, a +1 for “those other people should do it” is meaningless.

That's a fair point. I'm guessing the vast majority of people answering 
on the mailing list only plan to implement one codec because they are 
non-browser implementors.

Gili