Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

[cowwoc <[e-mail]>]

On 09/12/2014 12:32 PM, David Singer wrote:
>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 1:44 , Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> I note that the "confirming sense of the room" thread has gotten a lot
>> of messages that are not declaring a position on the question.
>>
>> I also note that from the messages on the thread, I can't figure out if
>> Keith Drage, Gili, Monty Montgomery or Peter Saint-Andre have taken a
>> position (I could guess, but I don't want to - besides, they might not
>> want to take a position, which is perfectly OK).
>>
>> It would be nice for me as a reader if people could:
>>
>> - state their position on the "confirming sense of the room" thread
>> - change the subject line when they want to say anything else
>>
>> That's my preference - of course, people who have "mute thread" in their
>> email readers might want the whole discussion to stay on thread, and
>> will hate me for the last suggestion....
>>
>> Harald
> Thanks, Harald, that would help.
>
> I would also like to know from those confirming the sense of the room, whether THEY THEMSELVES intend to implement both codecs, or whether they conveniently think they don’t need to, and it’s just a problem for other people to handle.
>
> Honestly, a +1 for “those other people should do it” is meaningless.

That's a fair point. I'm guessing the vast majority of people answering 
on the mailing list only plan to implement one codec because they are 
non-browser implementors.

Gili