IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC

Ron <ron@debian.org> Mon, 29 July 2013 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ron@debian.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3347621F8E2A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6xRzrnbzAWL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44E421F8EC3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp121-45-106-39.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO audi.shelbyville.oz) ([121.45.106.39]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2013 08:44:58 +0930
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC41D4F8F3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:44:56 +0930 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at audi.shelbyville.oz
Received: from audi.shelbyville.oz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (audi.shelbyville.oz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1WQJARWrG7cA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:44:36 +0930 (CST)
Received: by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D2474F902; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:44:36 +0930 (CST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:44:36 +0930
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20130729231436.GQ25981@audi.shelbyville.oz>
References: <CALiegfnU0U0juKu8y68K-pfkdf9NwQPxH=yM7vt=1EZEg=fxtA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnU0U0juKu8y68K-pfkdf9NwQPxH=yM7vt=1EZEg=fxtA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:15:05 -0000

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 07:31:55PM +0200, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, I initiated a thread [*] about Plan-Unified and multiple m lines,
> but it was moved to MMUSIC maillist (don't know why since it is about
> WebRTC applications design):
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg11966.html
> 
> Sorry for the cross-posting but at this point I'm a bit lost and do
> not know which is the appropriate group for my concern.

Have you tried a.r.k?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email