Re: [rtcweb] RTP Usage: RTCP XR metrics

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B57221F8A64 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:33:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.334, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8g8IxcigAz7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE4C21F87A4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:33:46 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAP0QA1GHCzI1/2dsb2JhbABFgmu7ZxZzgh4BAQEBAwEBAQkGXAYRAgICAQgNBAQBAQEKHQcbDAsUCQgCBAESCBqHbQELoViMapAGBASQWmEDiCyTboo7gneCJA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,541,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="49305624"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2013 04:31:46 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.14]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2013 04:32:51 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.14]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:34:07 -0500
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] RTP Usage: RTCP XR metrics
Thread-Index: AQHODe7ZoiEq9I65BEqhdI/HyMgtSJiA6YqQ
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:34:07 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA08E7D9@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <512235A8.4000700@ericsson.com> <51224C62.6030305@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <51224C62.6030305@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTP Usage: RTCP XR metrics
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:33:47 -0000

Leaving to each implementation select 'those stats that they find useful' means no interoperability. Implementations may select different stats, or even if they select the same parameters, in the absence of a common definition of the metrics the results reported by different participants in the same session may be inconsistent. 

Dan




> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Harald Alvestrand
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:45 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTP Usage: RTCP XR metrics
> 
> draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry is the closest I got to actually
> proposing something.
> None of the numbers I pulled up there drew definitions from the XR block
> documents.
> 
> I support removing this issue at this time; at this stage, I think it is
> best if implementations should add those stats that they find useful,
> and return to the issue of mandating their support later.
> 
> On 02/18/2013 03:07 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> > WG,
> >
> > In Section 8 of
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage/ there is
> > an open issue regarding RTCP XR.
> >
> > The question is if any RTCP XR metrics should be mandated or
> > recommended to be implemented in WebRTC end-points?
> >
> > So far there has been some lukewarm interest in metrics, but no clear
> > proposals on what to include.
> >
> > As an author I like to either get some discussion going or be able to
> > remove this open issue. So people, either make a proposal for what to
> > include or we will remove the TBD and consider the question dealt
> with.
> > Please note that there do exist signalling support for negotiating
> > RTCP XR metrics to use in a particular session.
> >
> > Submit any proposal no later than the 17th of March.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Magnus Westerlund
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> > Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb