Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Actionitems enclosed!)

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567B721F8C75 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YO5V3J8azC1N for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E28D21F8C72 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so2141386ywm.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=onJcYnlZ73P0X2hCTEHLXmHFLFyOdETAMfkqiBiGnas=; b=pZ5di7nBpn6SbhHzIP8M/a+LY9q0EUfAku5dxmKgYLsVFDkpsXGRoUFE4a05u4p9qR sMXWOA1gK+EPvHAQQjWmd6FU1TSqTUQoZ6XvhjfOEQT7z8BHtueC+DHt6HhUfmx5+nTv TYIGOD2Rd4b7+AxGK7tnBCi59ZTXgARYdkFJ0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.187.36 with SMTP id x24mr14686488yhm.74.1317833073634; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.105.169 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1450@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1450@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:44:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMC5B29bfBEhbqXFvyC9xKKKFVoSos7QLECnRk9fKnScKg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303dd9d03a2eed04ae8fec5c
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Actionitems enclosed!)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:41:26 -0000

Hi Partha,

We'd be happy to consider a signaling protocol proposal from you.
Unfortunately, the current iteration of your draft does not contain a
concrete proposal so much as a discussion of the advantages of a
standardized signaling protocol.   To make further progress, the chairs
believe we need concrete proposals at this time.  Please let us know if you
would like to provide an update with a concrete proposal.

thanks,

Ted

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Ravindran Parthasarathi <
pravindran@sonusnet.com>; wrote:

>  Ted, Magnus, Cullen,****
>
> ** **
>
> Could you please consider RTCWeb standard signaling protocol (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-partha-rtcweb-signaling-00.txt) draft as one of the proposal for this signaling discussion.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> Partha****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Ted Hardie
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:31 PM
> *To:* rtcweb@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB:
> Actionitems enclosed!)****
>
> ** **
>
> At today's Chairs call, Cullen, Magnus and I had a discussion of how to
> make progress on the signaling discussion.  We feel the mailing list
> discussion needs to have more concrete proposals in order to make progress,
> and so we're putting forward the following:
>
> 1) If you plan to put forward a draft proposing a concrete solution in this
> space, please send your name to the mailing list with that intent by October
> 7th *THIS FRIDAY*.
>
> 2) Please have a -00 draft out for discussion by October 14th (the
> following Friday).  This is to allow for a discussion and update prior to
> the -01 deadlines.
>
> 3) We will hold a conference call to discuss the drafts on October 21st
> (the Friday after that).
>
> Updates based on that discussion then have until the -01 drafts deadline to
> be complete.
>
> This is aggressive, but we feel we need to have at least -00s for the
> different ideas in place in order to make real progress.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ted, Magnus, Cullen****
>