Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE01F1AE395 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:03:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SmANcuLwNgx4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9151AE2DA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ez12so1786489wid.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:03:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+a8J51scmcvVzcTeLzEQbXKfwbWTPj/cCbvove+tcgA=; b=uaJ3CE2uAp/uwtEgfoIxJ08ptgz0QE36D3hjK1OeURF51FU+H2FCP5Gkz4dNKJBm/z IVVs9DBa5b3mVLc9rMpI3lIoShK1xkMaZq+vNQD7+y5//m2+WZKqOPh5wNtMWhO5aHvo XHhV9xLn8gNwscf8kNh6obo1h7euq9igJfGlxtVQLVmZNn8fAtF9kVQUfPG884X82Bg3 1Jv+DLAyzm5EIR5GgwBjwK9R52IQjFrEgeAUcWxDF0jCRUwkmSiNhAxhA3Yb5U1XgbLL Ftv3tWcTmSJOzpEW2YOsBwwEJQElCTH8oC5mBV14cRY139s2elbx61lpmEVKQkPG+eGA /ShQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.20.102 with SMTP id m6mr7765833wie.22.1385071389998; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.134.195 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:03:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWuvYMO2WseYoDBrpZxG4Nw1kDKxosHANzBbz0jG6WaPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <CAEqTk6RrHSzgJ9QA_spJQWN+6SaRWwwq6H4cwBxNbTHXnHmhYA@mail.gmail.com> <8647A71C-CDCF-4897-96D6-4CD1C6566BE6@cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-1kdXreZbF0Q7=DinObV5=eWcdfFuwrJ13BQ0Hk=Fec-Q@mail.gmail.com> <528E5B47.70702@nostrum.com> <20131121204147.GV3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <528E71AC.4040202@librevideo.org> <CABkgnnUKPMTpMqX6G5=kDQomG9wgqZeTomOnjGecTFZ7T3GjfQ@mail.gmail.com> <528E8142.1050309@librevideo.org> <CABkgnnWuvYMO2WseYoDBrpZxG4Nw1kDKxosHANzBbz0jG6WaPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:03:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXw1vk4kb17oPKbamFNJdPJpDtg2G4gkjs87xwArgNX-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:03:19 -0000

On 21 November 2013 13:58, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>; wrote:
> On 21 November 2013 13:55, Basil Mohamed Gohar
> <basilgohar@librevideo.org>; wrote:
>> It's no more crappy than having G.711 as a fallback audio codec for
>> legacy purposes,
>
> Actually, it is.  G.711 is close to free to implement.  And, despite
> it actually being crappy, there's still a lot of it around.


I forgot, if you want directly analogous, B&W RFC 4715 at QCIF might
be a good fit.