Re: [rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01.txt

"Chenxin (Xin)" <hangzhou.chenxin@huawei.com> Sat, 29 June 2013 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <hangzhou.chenxin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A318821F9DF9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CskKY-mqvkpe for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74B121F99F3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ASY56295; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 01:58:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 02:58:07 +0100
Received: from SZXEML454-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.197) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 02:58:56 +0100
Received: from SZXEML538-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.243]) by SZXEML454-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.197]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:58:48 +0800
From: "Chenxin (Xin)" <hangzhou.chenxin@huawei.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOc0qTTJEVT6akKUqbUiE3WeI/V5lK3rDAgAEQszA=
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 01:58:47 +0000
Message-ID: <9E34D50A21D1D1489134B4D770CE0397643B58FB@szxeml538-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF115DD1C1@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF115DD1C1@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.166.41.115]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 01:59:04 -0000

   I support to add NAT/FW traversal topic into IETF87 agenda.
   I will update the turn over websocket draft to give WG a option to discuss. If I could attend this meeting ,I would like apply a slice of agenda time to explain my proposal too.

Best Regards,
     Xin 


>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>Hutton, Andrew
>Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 5:36 PM
>To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: [rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for
>draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01.txt
>
>FYI - We have submitted an update to this draft and asked the chairs for some
>agenda time to discuss this and ask for adoption during IETF87.
>
>Andy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
>Sent: 27 June 2013 16:26
>To: Justin Uberti; Stach, Thomas; Hutton, Andrew
>Subject: New Version Notification for
>draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01.txt
>
>
>A new version of I-D, draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01.txt
>has been successfully submitted by Thomas Stach and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>
>Filename:	 draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations
>Revision:	 01
>Title:		 RTCWEB Considerations for NATs, Firewalls and HTTP proxies
>Creation date:	 2013-06-27
>Group:		 Individual Submission
>Number of pages: 10
>URL:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerat
>ions-01.txt
>Status:
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations
>Htmlized:
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations-01
>Diff:
>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-consideration
>s-01
>
>Abstract:
>   This document describes mechanism to enable media stream
>   establishment for Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (RTCWEB) in
>   the presence of network address translators, firewalls and HTTP
>   proxies.  HTTP proxy and firewall policies applied in many private
>   network domains introduce obstacles to the successful establishment
>   of media stream via RTCWEB.  This document examines some of these
>   policies and develops requirements on the web browsers designed to
>   provide the best possible chance of media connectivity between RTCWEB
>   peers.
>
>
>
>
>The IETF Secretariat
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb