Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?

[Leon Geyser <[e-mail]>]

Hi Magnus,

Was H.263 a typo?
I agree that 10 can be changed to:
10. MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, H.261}



On 25 November 2013 16:19, Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to draw your attention to the following two alternative:
>
> 10. All entities SHOULD support both H.264 and VP8. All entities MUST
>     at least implement one of those. Entities that do not support both
>     H.264 and VP8 MUST implement H.261.
>
> 11. MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, H.263}
>
> I would note that 10 and 11 are equivalent on the MUST level. The only
> thing that separates 10 out is the SHOULD implement both H.264 and VP8.
>
> Thus my question to the WG and especially the ones proposing 10 and 11.
> Would anyone disagree with removing alternative 10. in favor of 11.?
>
> Just trying to avoid having two alternatives that are extremely close to
> each other. My thinking is that if we manage to select any MTI, i.e.
> MUST statements, we can discuss what SHOULDs and RECOMMENDATIONs that we
> want to make in addition.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
> (As WG chair)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  [phone]
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile [phone]
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>