IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Mon, 04 November 2013 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CF321F9ED1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:35:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAb9DJmAD03z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:35:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDAD21F9E28 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:35:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ar20so12987539iec.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:35:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=zGzHTTdi36E/y8u4kYYMb2FRhXu8EG2LdBQtGyx3tgE=; b=mNLyEn52r1vHZZvbKCHWjgtwuc5JeYCkNaqohbk2x0juHnkaxg5JFWF8LP118LEdjr Ry/6S1QuvGuw6D3aVCaInlpFfYxkBiReGV/t2iib+7xg1Jk0UnnhkSNeJOu94GkcsJ9x KtgtX5scYc0+if3xBfMJB+rBV+fh/obTAz3WAF4XqLfIhEAh5JNKS5V7ho3HV67U/ZsC QZQ45oMxFjY/+PeV6Kbb8vcUf7EfN/bsasjyHTVw98Qy/wemrkqXJ1PAskE+mScgdqN7 JMhf5fhHtdJ+kkogd/0B2HoUzf/2SCvCEK6Jf0ZLIZBhZskdY516rAIwto3NikIHi3PX V24g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzYqFYLEa95DNSxn00j43U5dElYKhWaAa81o5GmPNME18v7cspacPVQsJmD53Smt8xlkSh
X-Received: by 10.50.30.66 with SMTP id q2mr4730766igh.17.1383582921540; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j16sm2854868igf.6.2013.11.04.08.35.20 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5277CCC7.7000003@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:35:19 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com> <20131102124801.GY3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <CA+23+fE1S_K93xk+3WNbq1RAFt8QD++pF74OJowu_+qz71H91g@mail.gmail.com> <5277CAC2.8000001@jesup.org>
In-Reply-To: <5277CAC2.8000001@jesup.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070203060806060004050702"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:35:32 -0000

On 04/11/2013 11:26 AM, Randell Jesup wrote:
> Interop is certainly a consideration and that's where H.264's 
> advantage lies.  (H.264's only real technical advantages are interop 
> and the possibility of existing hardware support).

     When was Constrained Baseline Profile defined? Based on Wikipedia 
I'm guessing it was sometime in 2009. If so, how widely is it implemented?

     We keep on referring to H.264 as a black box that is supported 
universally, but when you dig into the specifics (specific profile on 
specific platforms) the story is a lot less clear.

Gili

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status