[rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Mon, 09 May 2016 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7330B12D12A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 13:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2lIrnoGOMoZ8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp145.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp145.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B980312B032 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp31.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp31.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E191B380440 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:31:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp31.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id AC0C8380424 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:31:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [192.168.4.100] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [128.107.241.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.5.4); Mon, 09 May 2016 16:31:32 -0400
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1D53717F-3679-4E9C-B612-FA75BFF13032@iii.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 14:31:34 -0600
To: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/cJaH2_MkQFh71t2MyIx7r-QdDIc>
Subject: [rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 20:31:35 -0000
I've been looking at how WebRTC Identity and STIR work together and put together a worked out example at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-jennings-stir-rtcweb-identity-00.txt It does not propose any significant changes to WebRTC but it does point at a few syntax changes that might make things easier. Probably the key change for RTCWeb would be to unify the syntax we use for DTLS-SRTP fingerprints.
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR Peterson, Jon
- Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR Martin Thomson