Re: [rtcweb] RTT Education: Neat Demonstration of NON-peer-to-peer RTT (for future webrtc standardization purposes)

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 06:07 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CCF21F9310 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxBcftnYtZK8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC19621F9079 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=191; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370498838; x=1371708438; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=JLPs8FALyuTbFYL3S3GEkYq6Dkq19PA5btwRnrtfIjM=; b=aWkTBQAqDYvmm7q4YWoWK1TJsFojQZyrGKr+MoRkz4ASR9ANIPfkVjOK doeG5rrfyX3r1Hih7gceUM9eSkZTz4hxZQyxsc/J3B7GIhj1i90V2ibEm gaB64xJi0nVo5dgBC1Z+VMV2mFyOqGh1wXfr0bgg+WzFq08a6XMP9MmzQ Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AogFAPQlsFGtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgwmDJbxLfRZ0giMBAQEDAXkFCwIBCCIZCyERJQIEDgUIDodlAwkGs1gNiFKMUIIqMQeCemEDiGiMcI4EhSOBWIE3gic
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,812,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="219415694"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2013 06:07:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5667IY7026248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:07:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.36]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 01:07:18 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Mark Rejhon <markybox@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] RTT Education: Neat Demonstration of NON-peer-to-peer RTT (for future webrtc standardization purposes)
Thread-Index: AQHOYnwZcscUIJnJU0+Nf8/AfvQOrQ==
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:06:50 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135516D4@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CAA79oDkcKr6rWy=uJe2P7TuabiUeizJoHqtRMs=zYK7z3AW8OQ@mail.gmail.com> <51A8F85F.4090900@nostrum.com> <CAA79oDmXF=cnWqzaUE3dr3ZCbLqms=KhRgPOWWg1hMD=hOAArA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA79oDmXF=cnWqzaUE3dr3ZCbLqms=KhRgPOWWg1hMD=hOAArA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.70.233.131]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <9C5140E4A117BA478C665D127FE7E3FF@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTT Education: Neat Demonstration of NON-peer-to-peer RTT (for future webrtc standardization purposes)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:07:24 -0000

On Jun 1, 2013, at 2:31 AM, Mark Rejhon <markybox@gmail.com> wrote:

> Some countries made RFC4103 part of their government legislation.

Could you drop me a link to that legislation?