IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Virnetx IPR

Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> Sun, 01 September 2013 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A98C11E82AC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdA51ra2b2D2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x231.google.com (mail-oa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F4111E82A9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id i7so4514413oag.36 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5mtUfmuwjTt1mTHGhdjcvuZwlTR7B+Iv3g5TlyddnuA=; b=nisKwoWiem2KxNDZ2WEmN44sT2CVnCIwPCgNuPdctEcvVEr64DOI0O9awP45o9ROWV P70pC+aFSMy1VIi/NK1bHbkKLHSdEu0JwUbHUGF4VQSPbi3jNShBHCWkFybgqZPb4WP6 Vey9zACjQJ8GaoeIl4iYWQI0BYHTFer4q4lSLe8X1hGVAgMUvEcsApSKMGU2yfpKmK5c J3/gXe+5O7JW4skHnZMAOXDKhb0c3VQhQCzH1PxdUECGtWjWasyMGwOAnvP9mOhF2g0H YwrVUdPGTmby/oowrpwd2Tp4orDfW05FuTiF9FvJbmTnQCZ1M/5hP1yJUSTp7Lg3ONpz 8szA==
X-Received: by 10.182.134.229 with SMTP id pn5mr14160517obb.88.1378075159979; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.144.194 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5223991F.1040508@bbs.darktech.org>
References: <5223991F.1040508@bbs.darktech.org>
From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 08:38:59 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=ywG8j1rKNAbY-VLbeSk_G6vL999s55-Nf--7s1cybCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Virnetx IPR
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 22:39:22 -0000

FAIK it's unrelated: WebRTC is not using a vpn to establish
connections. But IANAL. :-)
Silvia.

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:44 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>     Is WebRTC affected by this?
>
> http://apple.slashdot.org/story/13/09/01/1233230/apple-now-relaying-all-facetime-calls-due-to-lost-patent-dispute
> and
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2010/08/virnetx-files-vpn-patent-suit-against-apple-cisco-nec/
>
> Thanks,
> Gili
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email