IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] New topic: Model for multi-unicast support

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 05 September 2011 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF9421F8B4C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 06:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.132
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.467, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S-kT3SLTJJDJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 06:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EEE21F8B36 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 06:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9C939E0FE; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:45:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hTz5-oAsjbHY; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:45:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [62.20.124.50]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC81D39E084; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:45:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E64D2C6.2020304@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:46:46 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <4E5F7344.4060803@alvestrand.no> <4E64BAA6.4010200@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E64BAA6.4010200@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New topic: Model for multi-unicast support
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:45:04 -0000

On 09/05/11 14:03, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>> >  
>> >  I think this forum needs to pick one of the options in my initial note,
>> >  and design its protocols and APIs accordingly.
> Sorry, I don't know which initial note you are referencing.
>
 From the quoted section in the note that started this thread:

 >  - We recommend doing multi-unicast with a shared RTP session only
 >  - We recommend supporting both shared and split RTP sessions for 
multi-unicast
 >  - We recommend doing multi-unicast with split RTP sessions only

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email