Re: [rtcweb] ROAP Example Application

[Tim Panton <[e-mail]>]

On 21 Oct 2011, at 12:00, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> 
> As I've noted before, they are more entangled than one might like them to be; if we don't support the extension to use a single RTP session, we don't know how many ICE sessions we need to set up until we know at least how many top level media types we want to support. If we want to support multiple RTP sessions for other reasons, we need similar control of the number of ICE sessions set up.

Who is 'we' ? Surely the decision of how many top level media types to support _must_ be taken at the 
application layer. The application has to make screen real-estate available for things like video, keypads etc.

> 
> It illustrates that while a lot of the concerns of codecs and ICE sessions are reasonably separate, the functions that manipulate RTP sessions need access to both.

And in my view the javascript needs access to _all_ 3 of them.

Tim.