Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
Andrew Allen <aallen@rim.com> Fri, 18 January 2013 00:32 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=1730224c61=aallen@rim.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CF721F86C8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:32:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.147, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihP7JnuGI+10 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mhs060cnc.rim.net (mhs060cnc.rim.net [208.65.73.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2939921F8667 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:32:55 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 0a41282f-b7f8c6d000004b29-12-50f8982f319e
Received: from XCT103ADS.rim.net (xct103ads.rim.net [10.67.111.44]) by mhs060cnc.rim.net (SBG) with SMTP id 1E.73.19241.F2898F05; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:32:47 -0600 (CST)
Received: from XMB104ADS.rim.net ([fe80::2494:a63d:e3:723b]) by XCT103ADS.rim.net ([fe80::c8f6:ae2e:c42b:3614%21]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:32:46 -0600
From: Andrew Allen <aallen@rim.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Steve Sokol <ssokol@digium.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
Thread-Index: AQHN9RB0oSCotGod0UC2ZdQqv/8CMZhOOm0w
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:32:46 +0000
Message-ID: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338CF31AB@XMB104ADS.rim.net>
References: <da75049e-76db-45da-974b-3e7ad66130f1@zimbra> <50F84BE1.1010404@nostrum.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20D7468A8BF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20D7468A8BF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.67.110.254]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrKKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC5Zyvo6s/40eAwbHzEhZ7/i5it3jaeJbR Yu2/dnaLb1e/sTiweLQ+28vqcaF7GZPHkiU/mTxm7XzCEsAS1cBok5RYUhacmZ6nb2eTmJeX X5JYkqqQklqcbKvkk5qemKMQUJRZlphcqeCSWZyck5iZm1qkpJCZYqtkoqRQkJOYnJqbmldi q5RYUJCal6Jkx6WAAWyAyjLzFFLzkvNTMvPSbZU8g/11LSxMLXUNlex0Ezp5MqYfmcBa8Eew YuELoQbGW3xdjJwcEgImErN+bmCGsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJLCSUaLp5Wx2kISQwGZGib875EBs NgFlieW/ZzCC2CICtRKX9n5jBbGZBdQl7iw+B1YvLBAucXzfdFaImgiJWztmskDYRhKvG/rA 4iwCqhKN96+CzeEV8JA49vYwC8TiDYwSv89ANHAKJEhsufmWDcRmFJCV2H32OhPEMnGJW0/m M0FcLSCxZM95qA9EJV4+/scKYStKLDtxkg2iXkdiwe5PULa2xLKFr5khFgtKnJz5hGUCo9gs JGNnIWmZhaRlFpKWBYwsqxgFczOKDcwMkvOS9Yoyc/XyUks2MYLSiaOG/g7Gt+8tDjEKcDAq 8fAezf0RIMSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmEV6kMKMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIjRFRgsE5mluJPzgaku ryTe2MAAN0dJnFey93KAkEA6MCllp6YWpBbBzGHi4ATZwyUlUgxMLalFiaUlGfGgBBhfDEyB Ug2MJtpRcfOuLp0WfDtj/7b7UZWyN78rp9d93P327qeW9VNSkvxM2Hdrvsu9mpVSvElGwsNg Iptw0HG+9X8mmr8XZJHv2xQT57zrmIahy26uOTIijyNfqOy5p8h2ZPe3PTf6Dvfu/NWRzLl1 mWarmoLXPoUdNQxfQ0xFu2cVxOVsSFIrz0kvOyinxFKckWioxVxUnAgAfJe0Q2gDAAA=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:32:56 -0000
Keith I think Adam is just saying there is no free lunch - everything has a cost. Some people have suggested that these codecs are FREE - nothing is for free. Once we achieve basic interoperability additional nice to have features (even if they are perceived to be an improvement) that will involve costs to implement should be determined by implementers based on their commercial merits. In my view G.711 is enough to ensure basic interoperability with legacy codecs - it's at least as good as interoperability between the PSTN and these legacy systems. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith) Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:12 PM To: Adam Roach; Steve Sokol Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs Integration, testing, and perpetual maintenance have absolutely nothing to do with the IPR question. I don't see any mention of any of Integration, testing, and perpetual maintenance in any of the statements about WG responsibilities in IPR. You are adopting the policy of saying everything you input is relevant to the argument and everything anybody else says in irrelevant. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Adam Roach > Sent: 17 January 2013 19:07 > To: Steve Sokol > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting > Recommended Audio Codecs > > On 1/17/13 12:00, Steve Sokol wrote: > > > > While it is not an optimal "internet codec", it costs nothing to to > > include G.722, so perhaps we can all agree that it should be > > included unless there is some reason not to do so. > > > > By which you mean it adds nothing to the licensing cost. Integration, > testing, and perpetual maintenance are not free. > > /a > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Burger Eric
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Emil Ivov
- [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting R… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… James Rafferty
- [rtcweb] 答复: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… 邓灵莉/Lingli Deng
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Eric Burger
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Eric Burger
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Ken Fischer
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Steve Sokol
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Koen Vos
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Shida Schubert
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… R.Jesske
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Bernard Aboba
- [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for C… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Flynn, Gerry J
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Burger Eric
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roy, Radhika R CIV USARMY (US)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roy, Radhika R CIV USARMY (US)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Burger Eric
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Roy, Radhika R CIV USARMY (US)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… stephane.proust
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Mark Rejhon
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Mark Rejhon
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Steve Sokol
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Steve Sokol
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Eric Burger
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Burger Eric
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Andrew Allen
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecti… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call f… Jean-Marc Valin