Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03: (with COMMENT)
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 04 May 2016 03:42 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EA912D7AD; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCyqBZtFDyFD; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C5412B02F; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id d62so42486826iof.2; Tue, 03 May 2016 20:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=G1m7tmXw6dwbuSZdHOTEEXIRp4Fl7iOHdup5GbwwyEE=; b=YsAui7eE8YCXe6KsmBl7tKTWoI5Dquak9ly1YggeprO4G7ETKWzI/FwWJJRQIk63ga u3fz7BiKrtQ1r4pY3YZS81to0TJmLpiiVRJQVUz7x1bXLX773Pt4axojgXcjwqQ3qLP2 mF090VlRannu3F74h2f7arm1neccA/gnYRsiNt+xkHd2FRLnWqadf50RYWvfx5ZDOVfK +lcbhS2mhFhKEA97CnVG/T/g7/vJoDgwFp/+cETe/EGSR/p6+Yof7z1lm6K7+G5vJLQP Y1fXxYJmLnzJJJ94CTcUXvUCme/ZcVdKMhlEmT+Tr2/bumaG8LOtFNiYQs8nqOwnVnla ZWnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=G1m7tmXw6dwbuSZdHOTEEXIRp4Fl7iOHdup5GbwwyEE=; b=l4NXchWeVcZa0ccsgd1wZOI/J59W5djr3rOcLuLs3mk0RlrnK2IiO1nTN1N61A/koA 6rLzITAZisR3zPf5j4oncZ5qh5BNfwBYhEgmokgB43heqLTvD3bukayZG64/VCGUUHx4 iDw7KBjdX1GxtNixTic9n8aPPkjCNeqgySnY/FR0b678Kjd++01aEPtYoduMSlQJNaql xRm65PoX7C3NAee2eHP07wGjRdH0QsaCc4F4q4/f6KA79fz2Oh4t3xzEprLTwalFvgZl RCGh2BTTKZM5ErFgAiVJlz/Vh1cEQ7RaFhragLGf1yBUrQHjjYx2Q0b7cQ3xCPGYKwyT D2og==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWQY/GWTUDZ8NLv7c8vdttoX1n6FOVn4kp2Rvpw/JWBcFyFBb19Z4QUfkTh4cCC6Q+7yMGzCjXMrXykeQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.136.76 with SMTP id k73mr7997902iod.100.1462333358320; Tue, 03 May 2016 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.82 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F72E0292-0069-4606-9998-4EAE19475D34@nostrum.com>
References: <20160504024043.8242.33067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnXef6uO0ZVZyiR5A8EeEAAGsLVJ9T8r4-QxS-qKAFWLZA@mail.gmail.com> <F72E0292-0069-4606-9998-4EAE19475D34@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 13:42:38 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU_8qm4Wsm2PP=xjA6viOk5B7GunBpGN5wQMe9aLX1N9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/caTGYhEsQ3HnkHlpZ-wVpI75yCI>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn@ietf.org, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 03:42:48 -0000
On 4 May 2016 at 13:28, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: > On 3 May 2016, at 22:23, Martin Thomson wrote: > >> On 4 May 2016 at 12:40, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: >>> >>> Should I-D.ietf-rtcweb-security-arch be a normative reference, due to the >>> citation in section 4? >> >> >> That was intended largely as a "such as", would be clearer if it were >> changed to: Peer authentication, such as that provided by Section X of >> [I-D.ietf...arch], ... > > > Possibly--but do you expect this to be a situation where a webrtc peer can > pick from any number of available peer authentication mechanisms in addition > to what is in security-arch, or is this pretty much it? That's the right question. It's the latter, so let's just elevate this to normative. It might be that this blocks publication, but think that the world can do without another RFC for a little longer.
- [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtc… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtc… Ben Campbell
- Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtc… Martin Thomson