Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

Option 7 already implies that to me. I'm in favor of leaving the list 
as-is or amending #7.

Gili

On 27/11/2013 3:33 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> It appears different because not only would it not choose an MTI codec 
> from among the present list of alternatives, but it also would take 
> the MTI discussion off the table in the future as well.
>
> > From: pgiralt@cisco.com
> > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:14:05 -0500
> > To: martin.thomson@gmail.com
> > CC: rtcweb@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec 
> Selection alternatives
> >
> > How is that different from Option 7?
> >
> > -Paul
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Martin Thomson 
> <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 27 November 2013 00:54, Magnus Westerlund
> > > <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > >> Today (27th November) is the last day to propose any additional
> > >> alternatives for the Video Codec Selection.
> > >
> > > Just to cover all bases, I think that there is one important 
> option missing:
> > >
> > > X. The working group MUST make no MTI recommendation regarding 
> video codecs.
> > >
> > > Just to put it on the table at this level. I suspect that many will
> > > prefer this over their most hated alternatives.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rtcweb mailing list
> > > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb