Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-turn-rest-00.txt

Matt Fredrickson <creslin@digium.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <creslin@digium.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8283521F9A74 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tDb3fdLNcYHT for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DACC11E8192 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r11so5116712lbv.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=0xFTV7yztDaJ8B0VgqrzmgoESrSAGp4dfJYcmK1lDw4=; b=mFTFTpXVC9r5o2v+6vxLIlX9utHahk5tfyMF9FjVTJc5cQiKWugHaErRWOSehH6WEs 9UPmzq7DIMd2ljdSjxhGvc20ulEiHIC+seHlGrDvCazmlbaQ/mzXbWg3bidkbthagrnb IfzDIGwb/y17IYzXWpTHtZClb+PPH5196MsXZa/XZdC4wmN3KKwMfdWCBoJZwsYwEIcI 27LQmD1rCEjkKt4xiH/s24Nsf9BiTYjDQE9POKQtmMorK38YK5/5rEL89W54dbyX9xOi ASlEkF+LE9GnOUmxd7T7zYyxD1p4nHva8oNWLJvVLxfcdWPnwQ1yc6B35uP49YwR4g+K gBFA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.201.138 with SMTP id ka10mr13614787lbc.72.1373407140530; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.141.161 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-2_oMAfTqyUzd6cdu2fkS04LQHGO+naqAy7z6KLjJDgMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130708041540.7930.93762.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zAs-NCJgiiHuFHi1ZEOdp2SB4v2-0AYrxBQ2R_gJ=nLcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0Vxkf-4j-ZHCisKuORob_cL3ogXoexTFMDMJDEttRbaQ@mail.gmail.com> <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE224183578@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-2_oMAfTqyUzd6cdu2fkS04LQHGO+naqAy7z6KLjJDgMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:59:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHZ_z=zdF0J3QsvC+yLrOSBiJNvz_T3zT25h753xhsicJsSWdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Fredrickson <creslin@digium.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c266bebe5fec04e11b442b
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmG4a6ADBbgalXGDO3Q8WdH9PmdK8nkv/1UjOaCMKJpeQmm7/Cu3UnNXo7wt5qnvsAekVWU
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-turn-rest-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 22:00:15 -0000

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal) <
> mperumal@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> 3) There is no text describing how the timestamp encoded in the UNSERNAME
>> attribute of the ALLOCAE requested could be protected.
>>
>
> In the HTTP Interactions section, I mention that the password used for the
> MESSAGE-INTEGRITY is a digest of the username, but I can make this more
> explicit.
>

Muthu,

What situations did you have in mind with regards to timestamp protection
that potentially would be vulnerable (beyond any protection the the digest
gives)?

Matthew Fredrickson