IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Sat, 14 September 2013 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C55921E8195 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 03:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1gPbvF1nh9NH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 03:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA4E21E8194 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 03:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:2001::1000]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66E46403CF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 06:01:37 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <52343400.3090408@viagenie.ca>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:01:36 +0200
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMAvdtq_gufKmDNCNCL+kKcxyi0MGUoVHetd9_DzbEdEnA@mail.gmail.com> <52334462.608@matthew.at> <52335E78.2080406@qti.qualcomm.com> <CA+9kkMCuHn3TR7umXtuScWixBfOD9jfS6mu3njxaCOADfG-nvw@mail.gmail.com> <20130914002635.3ebddfef@rainpc> <AD9E6715-0973-4959-8E55-FED0C4D401FA@yahoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <AD9E6715-0973-4959-8E55-FED0C4D401FA@yahoo.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:01:41 -0000

Le 2013-09-14 01:19, Bossiel a écrit :
>>> Cisco, for example, graciously agreed to provide an open
>>> source H.264 implementation should it be selected, in order to handle
>>> objections that none were available
>>
>> Open source implementations are not the issue (we have x264 for that), licensing is.
> x264 is GPL. I guess we're talking about an open source implementation with permissive license (e.g BSD)

I understand that the issue is the licensing of the IPR, not of the code.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status