Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 10 November 2014 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EB91ACF7C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:54:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xgbQcBPX8QiZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:54:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com [209.85.192.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 329301A6F71 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:54:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i50so6187284qgf.33 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:54:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sJ8l3Yb7JXEk5x4SsunTgctFOhFtpnZwr0JpnBD4ndg=; b=Z8/iuylPRdIdBMpygjwn733F+rHSBV6vQhSG4ZhTNMtiQCLUIdvs9WogkVaecdH6Tj Ur+W/cSjexQYTZqJOBJd086ae2lgHPyiNgmO2XcrnPvZwZ2sEBxh5iFSnYLXRAb/unXT qFbwkIxh55hKPW5sW80NrqtlC9lNqdxUyYW+q/V0+7ZjjaY6gKBuISZs28gPa8sYN+Kr 2yppoMbc6eWYJkxMV8rcCEUDPw1YX5xStKz6icYMxz+3ffdtwiR5YrYOL0RC219Kjuty mSkCc/ECl1/GGYHr8jLFp+pfLJw5ZGh95v0WS2Iqq98LQMedJMsgPAZYgxNKjRrKsBbV huYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk70Ijg8wduH7vOjwY6kZcgVdzhJxcPY8sKvoHp5CTu48yTdgGNOa3lGujC5/5z2NA0iRWn
X-Received: by 10.140.19.9 with SMTP id 9mr45420732qgg.98.1415660052880; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:54:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.49.100 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:53:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E7A2D65C-D6D9-430F-A12B-68AE4FBBFF01@matthew.at>
References: <54601E19.8080203@nostrum.com> <CALiegf=2taTKeWj2cojy0tZsTpM5WY9YyPOzNtCz3ob_3eq=1g@mail.gmail.com> <E7A2D65C-D6D9-430F-A12B-68AE4FBBFF01@matthew.at>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:53:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfkoT5ZvPQezZH5X9mvwGm_ZbN-72eCcMrVzHGKJ4rj1jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/cprGo1swlXA_im-Wc97jGYVse1E
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:54:15 -0000

2014-11-10 23:41 GMT+01:00 Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>;:
> Do you believe that making a codec mandatory in an IETF spec will force the corporate lawyers at the browser vendors to drop their objections to that codec?

And do you believe that avoiding MTI privative codecs an IETF spec
will force the corporate lawyers at browser vendors to drop their
interest in using privative codecs?

I'm not proposing that browsers MUST NOT implement non-open-and-free
codecs, but just that those codecs MUST NOT be MTI given their nature.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>;