[rtcweb] Notes from Data discussion today

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Tue, 04 March 2014 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8C21A063D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 03:31:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K6Gg_dIKI3CY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 03:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683791A0431 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 03:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-a508.meeting.ietf.org (unknown []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C434522E1F4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 06:31:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A44844EB-07A4-488F-9D2D-9BEDFF9512AC@iii.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:32:50 +0000
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/cryWO14PD1P4aZEQWRMQPKOfyIc
Subject: [rtcweb] Notes from Data discussion today
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:31:55 -0000

Data Presentation

Issue #1 

- Will say MUST use NDATA and ignore intermediate states till we have that
- Will keep the signaling of receiver seize limits

Issue #2
- add general statement on congestion control and specific for TCP windows based congestion control 

Issue #3
- say nothing about this in our specification and leave it to the SCTP specifications
- will propose the path max retrain = association max retrans in TSVWG
- no text involving this in rtcweb specs 

Issue #4 
- will remove negation and discussion of this. It is a point for the WG developing  SCTP.
- Ted to send text on how to craft such a statement 

Issue #5 
- part of the issue here is there is a protocol on top of SCTP 
- change to text say “reset channel”

Issue #6
-  will use the the "IANA registry for WebSocket Subprotocol names "

Issue #7 
- skipped due to time 

Issue #8
- The transports documents should make the DCEP  be MTI 
- The data channel draft will not require implementation of DCEP

Issue #9 
- this is an example of something you can do with tool set we provide and may or may not be a bad idea 
- do nothing for now and be sad later