Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437D421E82FB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 06:46:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZViUvWLBzXa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 06:46:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7426321E82CA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 06:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y10so3599640wgg.20 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 06:46:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yQJ7hUuGx050hRwCoxj0/G9mhTHECo5r5Dvbz/C2eLA=; b=I1Wz2XCEGL/rhZrjkpIrQ0V+YbhYruQdNyQkPflIy8kpNOuuR6m1ZnYYT3/vEjgDSA 4b0asR18LdfZQwemgjMLkivBGMqgTG60thxQzCTRw6MMqBuhDyDAUUggOyn3unOzJIEz WHgzwUC1vmDxXqPXkuKhX3lY4dkdY/ypa3Gt+80yDbCfceDkB70gFEwAlJaTtVFL8yqG G8wkwhRwFzLioFcckt0FpDxW8fNR0CRa0xy06vj+1trW8odxyVHT29chINRY64elDcMF HEi/Pk34NkyYTjJ39FTT1eBKfLkPa9oFC3qwoFingKBijR/i2f9FHBV1QdhZlQsurfkT 5UIQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.13.204 with SMTP id fa12mr16973935wid.22.1383662806007; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 06:46:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.202.194 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 06:46:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17C2EFD0@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17C2EFD0@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 06:46:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXKNJ_QRuV8vmKTJw5yZfcmwThhZ9t6GcgFWOJ7ePJNbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:46:49 -0000

On 5 November 2013 06:18, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@unify.com> wrote:
> How would we conclude that the community would like both to be made MTI?


If I were to pretend that I am a process wonk, I might say something
like: if the objections to both questions are weak AND if the
objectors are unable to find reasons that pass muster.