Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 15 November 2013 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F1211E8147 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 06:22:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dc9VCpGlO84Y for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 06:22:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B62511E80F5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 06:22:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD5139E336 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:22:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VtO0Us8CjVIh for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hta-hippo.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:1043:1:7646:a0ff:fe90:e2bb]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 401BC39E31B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52862E10.8000506@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:22:08 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <52855B35.3080605@nostrum.com> <CEAAB858.AA2AF%stewe@stewe.org> <CAGgHUiShX3wYpFCjUP9cK6isjQLMYDYcYCTbc=Ene9wHfaeNPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACrD=+-auo6VncrusOaRLjfFPNijwRdFomM0t8EwBEE4MZ=tUw@mail.gmail.com> <5285CCCE.6040906@ericsson.com> <528625E0.1030203@bbs.darktech.org>
In-Reply-To: <528625E0.1030203@bbs.darktech.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:22:16 -0000

On 11/15/2013 02:47 PM, cowwoc wrote:
> Magnus,
>
> Couldn't we alter the option with H.261 to state that we're proposing 
> an IPR-expired codec *like* H.261? I don't think we need to decide at 
> this moment which precise codec that would be.

If the proposal isn't for a concrete codec, it's impossible to evaluate.

Please - if you want this option to be on the table, make it a real 
option, not a "someone else should do the work necessary to figure out 
if it's a real option".