IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs call

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Sun, 27 January 2013 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361F021F869E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:02:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.280, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9khoK5C4Xbt for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s16.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s16.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C64821F87A5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU405-EAS409 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s16.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:02:38 -0800
X-EIP: [4x/RBxfda9H3/wQ3DmReaN9OiyhttFkz]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU405-EAS4093C921C763D716C4B9EE993190@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <50FD4C4B.9020700@ericsson.com> <CA+9kkMD7hYacr-P+iBdPiPYu4PWbMmu7tXYnYsNHRA18jogb=w@mail.gmail.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11338EB86@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <50FEB1EC.9060803@ericsson.com> <CA+9kkMDCn1M084-qcMWh38oao+A64ToQBZTo1wauyBbhD4mhjw@mail.gmail.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113397466@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA076D1E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <FB05674A-6502-4549-B061-F7F1B7E3A02F@cs.georgetown.edu> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0786E3@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0786E3@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:04:21 -0800
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2013 21:02:38.0624 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3922200:01CDFCD1]
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Burger Eric <eburger@cs.georgetown.edu>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs call
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:02:40 -0000

I agree.

On Jan 27, 2013, at 12:08, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> +1
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Burger Eric
>> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 9:39 PM
>> To: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
>> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio Codecs
>> call
>> 
>> A different document would be good. No need to to have an argument over
>> non-normative text hold up publication.
>> 
>> On Jan 27, 2013, at 4:14 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi WG chairs,
>>> 
>>> Clarification question:
>>> 
>>>> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
>>>> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant
>> Codecs".
>>> 
>>> Inclusion where?
>>> 
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> 
>>> Dan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:47 PM
>>>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Conclusion statement for Recommended Audio
>>>> Codecs call
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> We have been running a call for consensus regarding Selecting
>>>> Recommended Audio Codecs.
>>>> 
>>>> At this point the chairs are calling this as "no WG consensus".
>>>> 
>>>> We can however note a strong interest in a non-normative listing of
>>>> potentially important codecs including a description why they should
>>>> be considered to be supported in WebRTC implementations.
>>>> 
>>>> In lieu of additional normative text, we believe the WG discussion
>>>> supports the inclusion of a new section on "Additional Relevant
>> Codecs".
>>>> That can contain a list of codecs which are relevant in specific
>>>> contexts, along with a short description of the context for each.
>>>> Specifically there seems to be interest in understanding the
>>>> advantages and costs of G.722, AMR, and AMR-WB. We hope that text
>>>> would broaden understanding of the WebRTC use case contexts.
>>>> 
>>>> The WG chairs
>>>> Magnus, Ted and Cullen
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email