IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)

Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com> Wed, 19 October 2011 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <saul@ag-projects.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A7111E80B0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vC+PNEhz+r6J for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sipthor.net (node06.dns-hosting.info [85.17.186.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A5611E8098 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id DC634B01A2; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:14:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.99.36] (ip3e830637.speed.planet.nl [62.131.6.55]) by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DF55B017D; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:13:56 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159AA7@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:13:55 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3C2140FA-B177-4D62-B778-5297DCC30A10@ag-projects.com>
References: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF511599F9@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com><4E9E5D8D.6030707@alvestrand.no><2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159A20@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfk+Ezaz2Y4kFkooSozJsDyZZWxqdpX=fec==PYzBHm-bw@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159AA6@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <23CC8E74-8C17-4484-998B-2A7B66358B81@ag-projects.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159AA7@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
To: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:14:11 -0000

Hi,

On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Ravindran Parthasarathi wrote:

> Saul,
> 
> I have already mentioned in the mailing alias that *Please don't delete the existing mail* because we often miss the original intent of the mail and goes in the circular discussion.
> 

I quoted all your email and *properly* replied inline, instead of top-posting. The fact that your email client is not good enough it's not my fault.

> My original reply was intended only to answer Inaki query on how I come to the conclusion that "I'm not favor Inaki solution of SIP over websocket because it is overkill for signaling protocol". 
> 

I know how to read. I'm just saying that no one wants SIP over WebSocket as a "default protocol". It's up to developers, like Inaki, Jose in this particular case, to decide what to use. They chose SIP over WS, you may use something else.


--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email