Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com> Thu, 15 December 2011 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=323d1a520=tterriberry@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E7C11E8083 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:41:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id att0IGo9ou+C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxip3i.isis.unc.edu (mxip3i.isis.unc.edu [152.2.2.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF72A11E8080 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:41:13 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArsMAB1o6k6sGgRS/2dsb2JhbABDmnCPM4IZgXIBAQU4QAEQCyEWDwkDAgECAUUTAQcCwQuMBASINJF8FIx+
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,359,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="239689576"
Received: from mr1a.isis.unc.edu (HELO smtp.unc.edu) ([172.26.4.82]) by mxip3o.isis.unc.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Dec 2011 16:41:12 -0500
X-UNC-Auth-As: tterribe
X-UNC-Auth-IP: 71.114.12.189
Received: from [192.168.11.4] (pool-71-114-12-189.washdc.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.114.12.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.unc.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBFLfBvx025159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:41:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4EEA6977.9070104@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:41:11 -0800
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101120 Gentoo/2.0.10 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CB0F9A64.3572A%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CB0F9A64.3572A%stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:41:14 -0000

> "It is desirable to have a mandatory codec that is supported in the
> majority of newly deployed browsers.  Accordingly, the WG will wait for an
> indication of consensus among the major browser vendors for a mandatory
> codec of their choice.  If no such indication is received in a

I'd be willing live with a lack of objections, instead of requiring 
affirmative consensus. Historically it has been very hard to get the 
latter, even about much less contentious technologies, but there is some 
precedent that people are willing to voice the former.